What I’m saying is that Steve Bannon was involved in Gamergate, through Breitbart and learned how to recruit and activate these trolls for politics. The entire Trump campaign strategy was trial run by Bannon in 2014.
What I’m saying is that Steve Bannon was involved in Gamergate, through Breitbart and learned how to recruit and activate these trolls for politics. The entire Trump campaign strategy was trial run by Bannon in 2014.
I blame Gamergate for Trump - Steve Bannon learned a lot from it and implemented it for the 2016 campaign.
/v/ is where Gamergate organized their hate mob, so...
“the press has connected 4chan to...”
It doesn’t sound like they’re hiding anything, but that as you yourself pointed out. It’s impossible to give just one number and they had to build a whole system for identifying that range reduction.
The idea they argued against was an “adults only" section for this kind of content. This is not the same thing
I think you’re misreading that announcement.
YOU can't
These are astute observations. Like I said - I am conflicted.
And you’re right that these fans sought help.
How does having the language changed to English do any of the positive things you suggest? It simply removed the Kanien’kehá:ka culture from the scene to make English speakers more comfortable with it.
No idea how the rest of this is related to what I was saying.
This isn’t learning about that culture though, it’s forcing that culture to conform to you.
Like I said, I have conflicted feelings about it.
Yeah,I loved that part of the game. I'm not sure it needed to be translated into the language of colonizers.
It’s really hard to explain, but like. Why do we need to translate this into the language of the colonizers? Do they really need to know everything?
It’s not really a big deal. I’m Potawatomie not Kanien’kehá:ka, but I felt like the subtitles weren’t translated for a good reason. It was kind of beautiful to not let the…
I’m very conflicted about this.
I enjoy them.
Poe’s law describes a real thing.
Puritanical Victorians give no fucks about consent.
How the fuck is any of this shit Apple is bringing up relevant to the case?
Apple wants the adverse inference because this witness was very harmful to their case.