Bahahahahah for sure if im actually laughing.

Ah this has a no drop sensor but it doesnt have the little steps warning thing you are talking about my old roomba had. I guess i never worried about my pets bowl as thats a little area i dont mind being clean.

Ah this has a no drop sensor but it doesnt have the little steps warning thing you are talking about my old roomba…

It actually comes with one of those.

It actually comes with one of those.

It goes right over them. I have had no problems with my rugs.

It goes right over them. I have had no problems with my rugs.

No its had infrared sensors and a bump guard. It does stay an inch or two away from things and lets the little brushes grab things instead of hugging walls and stuff.

No its had infrared sensors and a bump guard. It does stay an inch or two away from things and lets the little…

Bought this the other day and am very happy with the purchase. It handles my dogs hair(long golden hair) very well and you wouldnt believe the stuff it picks up in what you thought was a clean room. Also its so loud my gf can nap in the same room its cleaning in.

Bought this the other day and am very happy with the purchase. It handles my dogs hair(long golden hair) very well…

As a former non-rev passenger(mom worked for TWA) the whole point is actually so that they(other paying passengers) dont know you are a non-rev. You are to blend in. They dont want to draw attention to non-revs not paying hundreds of dollars for the same flight. When I was growing up(you loose free flights after…

As a former non-rev passenger(mom worked for TWA) the whole point is actually so that they(other paying passengers) dont know you are a non-rev. You are to blend in. They dont want to draw attention to non-revs not paying hundreds of dollars for the same flight.

You STUPID POS read my reply to every other asshat here who doesnt understand how a civil case lawyer deposes of a defendant. He SAID brown didnt remove the gun from the holster dumb fuck. That doesnt mean he didnt go for the gun. It means he didnt remove it from the holster. Fuck off.

Tell that to the Justice department. You of all people should know what a Grand Jury is. Also go fuck yourself, your probably a “plaintiffs” lawyer working for TLC.

Forgot the forensics report for the DOJ

Not according to forensics. Unless of course you simply dont believe three independent autopsys.

I agree with a lot of what you said and as a St.louisain know all to well how fucked up some police here are. But as you said, things are to vague. This entire article is from a lawyer depo’ing a cop to fit his agenda of what happened.

So Brown didnt remove the gun from the holster. Agreed Wilson did(removed it from his own holster and pointed it at brown). Then Brown went for the gun(tried to remove it) or Wilson assumed him as going for the gun and it was discharge in the cruiser at Brown. The thing you need to understand is the importance of a…

read the whole thing. 64 &65 So he wasnt fleeing or trying to break from your grip before you pulled the trigger? Wonder why?

No he was simply trying to establish the wilson was the one whom drew the gun from the holster. 38,39, & 40 establish that he(wilson) did draw the gun. Go read the rest. What does 44 say? Now what would he be shielding himself from? What about 64. Oh he wasnt trying to break free from your grip? Thats because he was…

No the question was did he try to remove the gun from the holster. Then he follows with a question about how the holster is to prevent this. This is all to bolster the fact that without removing the gun whilst still in the car it would have not been in the equation for HIM TO FUCKING GRAB. Look at the follow up…

Yeah and reading comprehension or the law is not your stong suit. Let me knwo when you get a law degree and we can keep talking.

It was already established before the depo based on EVIDENCE that he tried to go for the gun. The questions are to frame that officer wilson was negligent and drew the gun for no reason. Browns dna and blood were found all over the inside of the car when the first shot was fired... INSIDE THE FUCKING CAR! Everyone one…

No the question was did he try to remove the gun from the holster. then he follows with a question about how the holster is to prevent this. This is all to bolster the fact that without removing the gun whilst still in the car it would have not been in the equation for HIM TO FUCKING GRAB. Look at the follow up…