I’d proceed with caution, especially after reading below where you describe yourself as “a romantic fool who doesn’t trust [her] own decisions.”

Fair enough.

I’ll put it on par with “Dumbocrats.” All of those would-be zingers are pretty lame.

So, no actual response or defense? Just a really limp attempt at being superior and patronizing?

If that were the primary issue, why wasn’t the headline, “Cops and Austin Paper Misuse Pronouns” and why was the lede buried?

It’s a pretty apt comparison. Considering the criticism of his play from the Buss family, it seems he’s also getting killed by the Jews.

You know how it sounds really dumb when Fox commenters say stuff like, “Obummer” and “Libtard?” Same thing when we say “Repugnant.”

You should ask for your money back because all that GIF says is, “I’m an unoriginal clown.”

Use your words like a big boy.

Definitely not.

I feel you. Nothing frustrates me more than when people are being intellectually lazy or intellectually disingenuous. And it’s crazy, because as smart as the average Jezebel commenter is, many can be alarmingly dogmatic and closed-minded.

Boom! Now that’s a good buzzer beater.

I’ve been enjoying your comments and your patience all morning.

“I recommend you read Jason Gay’s dispatch on the issue from last summer’s Tour de France.”

* Of course Sanders is asking for more than he can get. That’s how politics and negotiation work. By asking for more, even after compromising, you end up with more.

The end can’t come soon enough. Almost as dumb as Tebowing.

Unintentional bank shots always leave me feeling a little sad and ambivalent.

“I just wish he was more electable.”

I stopped reading right here. You had some sentences under it but, well...

I think that’s a fair and reasonable expectation. Sadly, I think there are supporters of every candidate on both sides of the ticket that make that difficult.