Why?

If you fumble, and the ball goes out at the 1, you get the ball at the 1. If the same fumble rolls one yard forward and goes out of the end zone, it’s a turnover.

But neither of them were home, so he just left a message.

The older players were just helping the freshman with his backdoor cuts.

Maybe. Football-going fans are disproportionately urban for sure, but they’re also disproportionately dumb. I’d call it a wash.

I love Porsches, can you send one to me?

Saggin’ his pants like that, this dog is obviously a Thug!

“Serena William’s closest competition for Sports Illustrated’s Sportsperson of the Year wasn’t even a person.”

Ah-ha! What a difference a comma makes. Gotcha.

Here’s a little secret. The world is not in nearly as bad a state as Jezebel and Gawker would have you believe. There has never been less war in the world. There has never been less crime in the US. Lifespans are near all-time highs. Things aren’t perfect (Economic disparity and climate change are real issues) but…

Whoopthee daisthy!

Soapbox? I mentioned it once, dedicating exactly seven words to it, in response to a direct question you asked me. It’s pretty much the opposite of “soapboxing.”

You’re right. You’re also taking this whole thing too seriously. But I’m sure Tom Brady appreciates that you’ve got his back.

It only answers the questions if you make the absurd assumption that they’re playing on equally talented teams.

Killing somebody with a car (assuming it’s not intentional) does carry the same charge/penalty as unintentionally killing somebody with a weapon. It’s manslaughter.

Agree completely.

I agree that he blew his second chance, and I’ve got no problem if he does hard time, now. I was just disagreeing with your first comment that his original “defense was B.S.” when to me it sounds like it was pretty accurate.

As I said to deerlady83, I definitely think it’s true and problematic (god, I hate that word) that he received different treatment than a poor and/or black person would have received. But, I actually wish that kids of all backgrounds were given second chances if they’ve been failed by their parents.

See, I’m a little torn.

But doesn’t the fact that Mom fled with her kid to protect him from the law support the judge’s assertion that the kid was never taught about consequences?