kckempf
kckempf
kckempf

This plus the earlier piece about Uber's CEO avoiding discussing profitability are two sides of the same coin. The only path Uber has built towards its own profitability is undercutting the market for transportation to eliminate taxis and public transportation and eliminating labor costs. 

Oh man. He was in fact that bad. 

The coach has a lot more to do with a team’s success than the QB, and the entire coaching staff changed after 2016. Whatever trajectory Kaepernick had under Tomsula was superior to the work other QBs have turned in under supposedly better coaches since last he played. 

There are bright spots on bad teams. That 49ers team had no particularly talented running backs and set a record for futility in stopping opposing runners. Jeremy Kerley was their top receiver.  I don't even remember who that is. 

He had 16 TDs against 4 INTs in part time duty behind the 49ers’ dreadful 2016 line, and he was injured the whole time.  The mouth breathers aren’t using stats in their arguments.

When those 49ers finally did break through to a Super Bowl they won it.  Against the Chargers.

Amphetamines are Schedule II, so they require a prescription. If they were his it wouldn't have been a problem. 

I ask local Steelers fan very detailed questions about Pittsburgh, in much the same vein. 

Of course it doesn’t make any sense!  But it’s the same straw man argument that gets dragged out in opposition to public transportation (or to be more precise, the kind of public transportation that doesn’t use private vehicles). Of course it won’t pay for itself — it’s a public service, not a for-profit venture.

No, I'm resigned to the fact that are roads are a charity.  But if I were a conservative then I'd want to abolish road taxes and replace them with direct fees. If you want the road to your house to be repaired you can pay for it yourself. 

If you are a Colts fan you might be sad to know that Kaepernick threw more touchdowns for that crap 49ers season than Brissett has thrown in his career. 

We could go to an ultra conservative approach for roads and fund them entirely from fees charged to businesses and residences reached by those routes. Something tells me the average American conservative would rather keep the current system that operates the roads as a pro business charity. 

Don’t the eliminated couples from DWTS go on that show for interviews? I would love for this to get incredibly awkward going forward.

Plenty examples out there of governments bending over backwards to find billions of dollars for a highway interchange but cutting bus lines because they can't be bothered to find drivers. 

I like driving. I don't like commuting. 

Pretty sure the writer is not being entirely honest about his motivations. Some people genuinely see it as a zero sum game between public transit and private vehicles, but every time there is opposition to a public transportation project you can see the dog whistle arguments about bringing "the wrong elements" to your

Definition of genocide:

The secret’s out.  Uber is Hydra.

They are not tough to make, which has contributed to my sustained weight despite living outside of the South for a decade.