This is such a weak take.

This article confuses me... It says “What was a revelation was the [intensity] men exhibit during games that are supposed to be just for fun, and [using all their] physical [assets] when they play.” Really? That was a ‘revelation’?

I’m patiently waiting for her response:

Yikes.

You raise interesting and important issues, but the article also demonstrates the difficulties from the point of view of men. The first section describes women feeling alienated and left out; not treated as a serious part of the game. The next complains that women get injured because men are taking things too…

The women on our soccer and softball teams were huge handicaps. They struck out in softball (they were given 5 strikes just for being girls) often. They couldn’t field, pass, or do anything effective. I joined co-ed sports to hang with friends and co-workers but to also compete in something and try to win.

“A friend of [the bride] was walking around the wedding with a cane, because she had just torn her ACL in a co-ed soccer league, because a guy fucking tackled her.”

Ok so if playing with guys isn’t fun, then wouldn’t the solution be: don’t play with guys? I’m not getting it.

OK so you dislike rules that enforce minimum women to play, and also dislike the fact that leagues without these rules tend to have no women playing.... What is your preferred ideal league rule set?

Then don’t play in them? There are women only leagues. What I don’t get is the same people that push the women and men are squarely equal narrative are the same ones that write the articles complaining about imbalance. Guess what - women can’t compete with men in basketball - the physical attributes between men and…

Liberals have memes and pussy hats, conservatives have computers and advanced statistics.  Knife to a gunfight.

IT’S NOT ABOUT PEOPLE BEING OFFENDED.

cuck

it’s hella convenient all these guys “grow and change” and “stop being that kind of person” once “that kind of person” becomes a financial liability.

Huh. So, buh-bye James Gunn.

Maybe y’all shouldn’t have weaponized the internet in the first place?

Well then they have a very good point wouldn’t you say? If have a society where people get fired for tasteless jokes (see: Justine Sacco) then Gunn should have been fired. This is what the PC outrage mob have asked for.

“Top-tier universal healthcare” right up until you actually need to go in for a tooth cavity and they tell you to go home cause they don’t have any instruments to do it with or a doctor on duty.

You would lose that bet. Photos of the suspect have been released.

After reading this whole article and not really seeing what the point of it was, the only conclusion I was able to come to was "Who gives a shit?"