The only argument you can come up with is a fallacy. You can’t logically defend what constitutes an acceptable name because it’s impossible.

You’re not making an argument. You’re jut reiterating your preferences

I also wouldn’t like to have short hair or a green car. That doesn’t mean my random irrational preferences are superior to others. I also don’t like having the name Katie O’Neill. I wouldn’t like to have the name Jane or Esther. That’s my personal preference

No I didn’t think that and I don’t care. Tradition does not confer superiority on some names or practices over others. Every “traditional” name was new once upon a time. Names that are popular today will be unpopular tomorrow. It’s totally irrational and to pretend otherwise is ridiculous

Who decides what’s a name or not

I dono what your name being Polynesian has to do with anything

that’s like asking me if I think it’s acceptable to have forest green (protip: it’s not) as a favorite color. There’s no such thing as an acceptable name

They’re obviously trademarking the full name

Or maybe that baby would be sad that he had those names and not something cool like sir. Name preference is like color preference. There’s no set of appropriate and inappropriate favorite colors. There’s no set of appropriate and inappropriate names or favorite names

Mercedes is no longer ok?? Gtfo

So what you’re saying is the government saying what people can name their kids isnt’t absurd as long as they’re not restricting me from using names that *I* might want to use... sounds very sensible

You’re so cool

That’s literally just pure random personal preference based on nothing logical so I don’t know what the argument is there

Explain to me the logic of acceptable names. It’s funny that you’ve been using the appeal to tradition fallacy the whole time and now you’re trying to use ad hominem because your argument is shit. I don’t have kids but I do have one of the most common names in the western world. My name is Pure Oath of God Strong.…

No your list was a stupid list void of logic so it makes no difference whether any particular name was part of it or not

So names have to be used at least once for them to be *names.* well obviously that’s impossible

That sounds terrible

This is so stupid. There’s no such thing as an actual name.

You know like all of our names are pretentious af. Names became names because they were positive adjectives people called their children. Get over yourself. Judging someone based on their name is what prejudice is. It doesn’t matter if you do it according to race or whatever else you think you know about a person.

So some names are better than others according to the appeal to tradition fallacy