Bless Rand Paul. He may not always do it for the reasons you’d want him to, but when it comes to Republicans willing to make a fool of themselves in order to intentionally make fools of the rest of their party, no one can top him.

Everyone is speculating that Scarlet means that monogamy is specifically hard for her but... What if her exes were the cheaters? If you have a couple cheaters in your past, intellectualizing it as “Well, I guess monogamy is really hard” or, in the old version “(insert gender here) cheat” is pretty common.

This is why we need to reform our immigration system to make it easier for people to get in legally. Until we do, people will keep getting stuck in this double-bind.

Do you think you’ll be writing a female protagonist - that is, the main viewpoint character, not just a major positive female character - in some future novel?

......... There is no connection between bisexuality and polyamory. Where are you <i>getting this</i>?

If you were identified at birth as male, but personally identify as female, you are a transwoman. If you were identified at birth as female, but personally identify as male, you are a transman.

Actually, if one of them is going to be shorter, it makes sense to make them both shorter!

Except for how they still are, except in a more sympathetic way? They’re still on the “Who’s dating Archie this week?” merry go round.

Yes. There’s an acclaimed documentary “An Open Secret” on this very thing, and it mysteriously can’t get proper distribution. I wonder why. /s