It’s more of a minimum standard, especially in a litigious society.

As a parent, I have been present for meetings with my child and speech therapists, psychologists, and Drs. I watched my daughters when they went to ice-skating, gymnastics, swimming, whatever classes. When I was a Brownie leader, there was a 2 leader minimum, a required adult-to-child ratio, and mandatory criminal…

Hi...Sorry about this, but I’m very immature, so I’m going to respond to this.

:( best of luck

I know, right? All my sympathies, by the way. I’m just greatful that my biggest sex problem/insecurity was solved by childbirth. I have to wonder why women aren’t given better counselling on non-penetration based satisfaction.

A few concerns;

Three reasons that come to mind:

Donnie is real delicate flower. It would be a real shame if women had nurse-ins at his ralleys and threw him off his game. Also, if he is going to smaller towns, it should be pretty easy to block off the highways going in, and deprive him of his audiences. I’m not bitter or anything.

If he were his businesses wouldn’t keep going under. I think you underestimate his need for public adulation, and to treat any asset he owns as a personal slush fund.

But that’s the thing. His supporters aren’t the poor or the working class. They are white less educated men with a median $76,000/yr income. The advances made by minorities or women cost them nothing. They still have a good income, are free from discrimination, and have the right to make decisions over their own…

I keep hoping.

Given Russia’s determination to derail the election, had her server been hacked, the 30,000 missing emails would have been released by Wikileaks by now. We know that the government server was, there is no evidence her private one was.

What she did was avoid the government server, which was old and frequently crashed, for a server that actually works, and has not yet been hacked (unlike the government server). A lot of people shared the same frustrations, and for practical reasons used personal email at the time so that they could actually do their…

I don’t know. At the charity dinner, the one who couldn’t laugh at himself (and consistently shows he can’t take a joke) wasn’t the Democrat.

I’m really curious about item 3 on the 100 day plan, where federal funding will be cancelled to Sanctuary cities i.e. LA, Chicago, San Francisco, New York (among 300 others).

When Donald says he will cut off Federal Funding to the 31 sanctuary cities in the US (i.e. New York, LA, San Francisco), what does that mean?

And of course, there is #3 on the 100 day mission - privatizing road and bridges. Anyone else looking forward to the toll booths?

Canadian here, and wondering.