yea, scummy behavior, but can you say that her consent was invalid?
The problem is we live in a society where consent isnt clearly defined, and as the OP said, we need to do a lot more to avoid situations like this by teaching a better understanding of consent

“by his logic”? That’s a lot of assumptions about how the incident went down. If this was a white director, would you be so willing to give the benefit to just one half of the “he said, she said”?

So this is my point. You have to stretch and bootstrap your thoughts on (C) into some patently false belief on (A) and (B)

So I googled it for you. YES Hillary has a record of (A) knowing about Bill’s accusers, and (B) actively engaging in efforts to discredit and humiliate them in a way that would make Roger Stone…

YES he has been accused! So let’s begin by picking apart their pasts, accusing them of being mentally ill or partisan shills, and start excusing Trump surrogates for efforts to intimidate the accusers

i think if a MALE member of congress was running and he protected a colleague by intimidating an accuser you would be the first one to picket his campaign events

this rhetorical shift relies on ignorance and some overly-generous assumptions to work. Basically you have to believe all of these false statements:
-Hillary Clinton didn’t know about Bill’s pattern as a predator. (Demonstrably false)
-Hillary Clinton’s didn’t engage in deliberate character assassination of the accusers…

this is 100% concern-troll.