So can anyone fill me in on what Brutal Doom is all about? I played the original Doom(s), and I definitely know what mods are lol, but I mean what all has this mod added?

Haha, touché! I was actually wondering when someone was going to post this. The three videos posted are actually how I first learned about the theoretical "fourth dimension" and beyond.

I like this video quite alot as well, it made me understand dimensions better.

No one but you mistook those statements to mean "using caffeine is safer than not using caffeine". There's a single word in there that implies the opposite, that you seem to have missed, though I'll get to that in a moment... Everyone else (everyone who wasn't simply looking for a semantics argument) read that…

"Safest average dose" meaning "the average amount that can be consumed safely without experiencing harmful side effects."

Such as?

What's your point? Continuing the analogy; Even if the studio apologizes that the film wasn't true to the original, they never gave any sort of hint that they intended to give the updated DVD edition away to people who weren't pleased with the film. So the studio acknowledging that the film wasn't perfect doesn't…

Let's rework this analogy, and you'll (hopefully) see how flawed your view is:

See but that's the problem. If you go to a movie theater, watch a whole movie, and come back out demanding your money back because you didn't like it, they'll say "Sorry, you watched all of it, and you got what you paid for whether or not you enjoyed it." This situation is similar. Just because you personally didn't…

Yeah I never understood why the US got that.... thing, and Japan got good ol' Rockman.

I understand the notion, but if someone is committing a crime in the stall (assuming they move every so often) wouldn't the glass simply stay opaque, concealing the crime? lol.

I know you guys wait to test stuff out yourselves before a verdict is rendered, but perhaps you guys should mention that Kirk's experience of crashing isn't the norm. I respect your guys opinions, but it might be helpful to prospective buyers to know that the PC build of the game is way less glitchy. In fact, the…

My point is, I guess, that originally calling them "fake" for liking games is kind of dumb. If you don't like that they use their interests to garner fans, that's fine and I respect that, but they're no different than most idol groups in that way lol.

Like I always say when arguments like theses come up, how can you tell they are "fakes"? I never understand this shit at all because it makes no sense.

Right. And it's a difficult skill to learn. But this game sounds exactly like the downward spiral experienced in a panic attack too. (ie. You start to panic, which intensifies the symptoms, causing you to panic more and more, making it that much worse, etc.)

This makes me think of that Minecraft Flashdrive project.

It depends on how you define "safer".

It isn't faulty because short of actually experiencing the nuances of the game I intend to buy, I can't very well tell if I'll like it or not. I can learn all sorts of shit about a game beforehand but that still doesn't tell me whether or not I will like it. Reading about a game, learning about a game doesn't tell me…

The problem is that you're wrong, telling me that what I'm doing is somehow morally questionable. In this case there is no black or white. It's all based on a sliding scale of gray.

Right, because it's only "that one game" and not more like 90% of games. And there's a huge difference between paying $2 for a box of cereal and finding out you don't like it and paying $30+ for a video game just to find out it's total shit. If you can't see how those are two completely different scenarios, then it…