Oh look at this outrage guy - you’re so honorable eh? Really taking down a woman who has done more with her life than you ever will.

She’s paying for the doping sins of the motherland. The investigation placed no blame on her, yet suspended her for two years when it was a medical prescription. Ridiculous!

So they concluded that she didn’t intentionally violate anti-doping rules, and it was a substance that was NOT on the ban list until only what a few months before her positive test... and they still handed down a 2 year ban?

My point was that the brand of gender/racial identity nonsense that the Times reporter reflected is bad for everyone. I used that example to point it out. Did anyone ask her the same type of loaded question about Obama in 2008? No.

It’s sexist for him, a politician, to attempt to leverage his political support into influence on a political platform? Not a very strong take, kid. Bad post.

thank you. hillary only stands with white women like lena dunham. not the women of palestine or honduras. people seem to forget she’s not marginalized.

What bothered me is the “standing in the way of history” remark in the reporter’s tweet. Based on that, is Hillary standing in the way of the first potential Jewish nominee?

That’s what I don’t get. Instead of encouraging Hillary to adopt some policies that would benefit them. (Healthcare, income, taxing the wealthiest.) Every comment on a Bernie story is ‘shut the fuck up old man.’ it’s insane.

Is it anti-semitic to refuse to debate a Jew after he asked her to?

It is sexist for his surrogates to discuss “voting with vaginas”

I agree that Bernie probably should step down after tomorrow but the tone of that tweet is terrible. It makes him sound like a tiny little pest that’s tarnishing what should have been Hillary’s automatic and perfect nomination path. Which if we’re being honest, he has been, but why is that a bad thing? I mean, since…

Whoosh

This is the kind of bullshit that desensitizes the word “sexist.” Now, Bernie should absolutely concede and endorse Hillary, but him not doing that is in no way sexist. That’s fucking ridiculous. Obligatory:

Out of curiosity, was Hillary asked if she was racist for trying to get in the way of the first Black president? I don’t remember that happening but I could have missed it. Has Hillary been asked if she is being anti-Semitic for standing in the way of the first Jewish president?

By that logic, Hillary is anti-semitic because she is standing in the way of the first Jew who could become president.

For real, though, that is an incredibly dumb question.

So basically, if I'm not black fuck me either way? Care about this, but don't dare think affects me in any way? Nice pitch, good luck.

And that's shitty to say, come on. This isn't just a black issue, this is a person issue, a human issue. Fuck the brutal fascist shits that make us unsafe in our streets, fuck the culture that makes those in power above reproach for violence they do to those they're supposed to protect. If this isn't about you and me…

It's not about you.

We shouldn't have to explain why...