How is comparing a male-only space to a female-only space disingenuous when we’re talking about a federal law that states:

I like this idea:

Uh I think he knows what double-standards are and that’s precisely what he’s upset about. At least you do admit it’s a double-standard (albeit a “necessary” one in your view for the safety of women who want to study without being murdered).

Yeah I think the key here might be also making a male-only study space if that’s what they were going for, right?

Wait, so are you saying that because there are greater issues with violence against women, that men being banned from a public space which could violate a federal law, is not an issue that should be addressed?

Yeah the problem is that if MSU created a “mens study” space and literally prevented women from stepping foot in it, you best believe it would be a Title IX violation. So how is this not a violation of that very specific law?

I mean, it sucks because I understand the need for safe spaces, but can you really make a legal argument that in a public university, creating a space funded by the university, where men literally cannot go doesn’t violate this?

Imagine if a white show runner said that about white actors though! Cringe.

Who said anything about a fictional WET? Clearly that shouldn’t exist because a majority of networks and shows are white already. :)

It’s so interesting how privilege dynamics and representation create two very different realities.

Commendable for sure... but legally you could force him to pay it.... and he could have his wages garnished or be thrown in jail if he refused.

I’m curious, how do you feel about the fact that men cannot opt out of parental financial responsibility?

I’ve long felt that one of the key ways to be a “pro life” democrat is to focus on things like:

It’s always interesting to see how someone’s identity is literally the only thing that can make some people backtrack on the generalizing and stereotyping.

Have you ever heard of the term “intersectionality”?

It’s because they discovered the term “Bernie Bro” (white, straight, male caricature who is a “frat bro”) to demonize any support for Bernie Sanders... and with identity politics, it’s popular (and useful) to write off anything completely based on gender and race.... as long as it’s a white male.

It continues to amaze me how acceptable it is to demonize a specific race and gender. I guess that’s identity politics in a nutshell.

I almost chalk it up to laziness and inefficiency more than anything.

Sure some of the criticisms are overblown... and sure Bernie should keep pushing his people to vote for Hillary, but that’s a far cry from

Are you serious with this? So none of the criticisms of Hillary & her campaign have any merit, and if Trump wins it’s all Bernie’s fault?