I apologize if you saw my question as hostile. Really didn’t mean to trigger your delicate sensibilities. But to reiterate, so the immigration status of a random pizza delivery guy was a theoretical crime that you found concerning enough to pause you in your pursuit of murine relations, but you don’t care who’s…

Very sorry to interrupt you in the middle of a very important gerbil fucking session, but I’m curious as to why people who are sticklers for legality in some instances support this guy:

I think this article misses the point. Ignoring means he’s unaware of it. I would think he may well be aware he’s making the immigration problem worse. Yes, there may be more MS-13 members, doing more crimes, and that’s a vote-getter that’ll give him more excuses to act in a draconian fashion.

Not from Russia, apparently, he thinks leaving the election system exposed to hacking makes Georgia great again:    https://www.newyorker.com/news/news-desk/trump-election-hacking-and-the-georgia-governors-race

That fucking bust of MLK story is still the only example they have of the media getting thing wrong.  

I wish she had asked him to name one of those individuals.  

And Trump.

“fairly strong representation of what happened in the campaign” Still not telling the truth, just representing what he wants to sell.

If she can swat his hand away in public, I doubt she’s not going to swat other bits in private.  

She could probably find someone to marry her if she wanted to stick around. Or she could skip town and marry a Mexican or South American billionaire with decent hair, if she wanted to twist the knife.  There’s likely a long line of Trump enemies who would do happily “make an honest woman out of her”.  I don’t know if…

There’s no evidence that she’s a good person, but I’d be happier to know that the indications that they hate each other are on the mark.  Would be amazing if she were to testify against him.  Even if if it’s just for her own benefit, or out of spite.  

Gosh, sure sucks when people don’t appreciate boundaries. 

Also, they’re private citizens. They’re allowed to monetize their skills and experience. Monetizing the presidency, as he’s actively doing, violates the emouluments clause and is unconstitutional.

Maybe not so much after he started doing tariffs without asking anyone if it’s a good idea for farmers.  

Wow.  Who’s dick would Jesus slice off and then take a bite out of?

Yes.  As is amply shown, they don’t half-ass it.  

Even more so when people know that about someone and they elect them president.

Yeah, when he dies, shrink wrap this onto his tombstone.