My daughter did not understand why her intelligent, academically capable friend did not speak to her for weeks after said daughter wore that Happy Zombie Jesus shirt for easter.

My in-laws would buy me clothes in literally more than double my size. I am not that entirely small, so we are talking like 20-24. Then MIL or SIL would say things like, " I am usually good at judging size. I hope they fit." Once I read that there was a shortage of large-size donated clothes for homeless women's…

Give them this:

I HOPE Trinh was hugely paid off. I hope Trinh had already forgiven Wahlberg. I hope Trinh had found peace, could feel safe, and gotten on with his life. And then was massively paid off to say this in public.

Remember in the eighties were supposed to be frightened of *actual* *babies*? OOOOOHHH "crack baby" ooooooooh

... resisting arrest while black, poor, or struggling with mental illness is clearly a death penalty crime. Combine any two and all you have to do is exist in the vicinity of a cop. :-(

I am a big advocate for using the terms "victim" and "alleged assailant". Because if you are going around making these claims, something is clearly hurting you. Like when Tawana Brawley rape claims were a hoax, there was still something very wrong with her life that she ended up in a trash bag covered with actual…

Part of the problem is Jake Baker, also known as Jake Baker.

Well I think you are an idiot. There is established legal doctrine that they are trying to change from having to prove reasonable fear to having to prove the actual state of mind in a the person issuing the threat.

Actual threats are not now and never have been protected.

First, the threats were named, specific, many were detailed, repeatedly issued to the same set of named people yet varied in mechanics, consistent over a long period, and he has already committed acts of violence against that named person. So other than that six things maybe there is some tiny legally insignificant…

He mansplained mansplain! It is an awesome moment in recursive entitled idiocy! And we were here for it.

>How is his comparison incorrect? Mansplain please.

She was at the bank!

OTOH I love Charles' food blog. And the fact that he is also banned from picking the lunch place.

Except for the part where it is ignorant and ill-informed. But other than that, hey you know how to spell.

The wildly disproportionate killing of black men, the killing of black teens, the killing of black *children*, the killing of the mentally ill of all races, the killing of any person who disrespect them, and the complete impunity with which they kill.

It means that the comment, "Your point is well taken, but please let's not gloss over the lives that have bee ruined due to false rape allegations in our nation's history." is ahistorical and ill informed.

Suddenly the concept of enthusiastic consent has disappeared from the Jez. I do not understand this dialogue.

The protection of virtue is bullshit in this case, and it has almost always been bullshit.