justonevote
JustOneVote
justonevote

“...because they don’t want government money to go into killing babies.”

That football’s got to be at least 0.5 psi overinflated. Completely understandable that they would lose control of it.

He’s the one in the story with poor judgement? No.

Yeap. I played high school football and this is how it is... but that doesn’t make it right. It. is. just. fucking. sports.

A hot dog.

So what’s wrong with bathing suits?

they are not bathing suits. early comic book costumes for all genders were designed after circus performers leotards, invented by Jules Leotard in the mid 1800s.

Well of course, practicality looks radically different from“cool” 90% of the time, just look at any real medieval armor outfit, and compare it to whats often shown in movie and tv. That being said, there’s a difference between practical, and cool. Cool-looking designs are not much different than “sexy” outfits, but

very reminiscent of crystal structures and grain boundaries in metals.

Oh, you fucking prick. You had to put the result in the headline, didn’t you? Under 50 fucking words of content, you whoreclown, none of which add anything. Did you post this from your iPhone? Fuckin’ Burke. You know what that means, right, when someone calls you a ‘Burke’? It’s rhyming slang for ‘Burkely Hunt’, or

Secretariat.

I didn’t get the hate at Joss Whedon for trying to imply she though her infertility made her a monster as that wasn’t what he was doing as she was talking about her overall past with the KGB. The problem was editing through that scene wasn’t the best and it felt really jumbled up to what they were actually talking

That still pisses me off...

Thank you.

clears up with the Banner/Natasha scene in the house where they discuss about being monsters

Wow, i09 is publishing the small minded musings of an individual that that cannot accept the possibility that evolution can be tool of something greater than his own hubris. Humanity is dimished. Bring on the reviews of science fiction media. Check your political and religious rantings and misgivings at the door.

"This means that Catholics don’t believe in polygenism, the idea that humans are descended from a group of early humans."

I think you're overdoing it here. From what I understand, what they're saying isn't that evolution has to be guided step by step by some god. They only take the position that God started the process from the beginning (ie Big Bang) and has been overseeing it ever since. I see no reason why they can't be right about

I am not a Christian, nor am I a believer; however, I feel that it is the reasoning in this article - which is typical of most anti-theistic arguments against the reconciliation of the coequal magisteria - that misses the point. The Catholic church's - and again I must stress that I am neither a Christian nor a

The only thing you did to elaborate on why the Church's position "falls flat" is say that Darwin's theory doesn't need "Deus ex Machina" divine intervention. As if just because a man, Charles Darwin, says God wasn't involved, that fully negates what any reconciliationist would propose. You fall even more into fallacy,