No, because of its opacity

I disagree. Character flaws are not disabilities.

The Trump foundation only.has 1.3 million left in it. Look up his form 990. He needs that money for bribes and lawsuits

She was trying to sound like a thoughtful person, but failed because she is a vapid bimbo

Enough to get enough of his supporters off their asses and into voting booths to outperform media predictions of every primary outcome.

That’s hyperbole. We don’t need hyperbole to justify a Clinton vote. Let’s leave that to Trump.

Successful politicians have something called <i>charisma </i>. Bill Clinton had it. Obama had it. Sanders had it. Trump has it. Hillary Clinton does not. And, as a result, the future of the country hinges on how many times Trump is going to show his ass between now and November.

I learned about Barron when he used him as an example of how he thinks vaccines need to be “spaced out more”. And when I learned that he’s named after “John Barron”, his fictional spokesperson whom he impersonates when he wants to talk about himself in the third person to the media. Barron is basically an avatar for…

Our circumstances are different from those of Weimar Germany. Our country is far more prosperous: we aren’t suffering from the kind of inflation that requires you to carry cash in a wheelbarrow, and Germans were so impoverished that they had little choice but to get behind the guy who was going to feed them.

I think it’s important to distinguish between having feelings that are racist and allowing those feelings to influence ones behavior and treatment of others. The Clinton supporters have a cognitive bias; the Trump supporters have a character flaw.

The false equivalency these idiots pull out of their ass is the most frustrating thing about these people: “two equally bad candidates".

Her “detailed policy proposals” are so ambiguous that they can mean just about anything. Ask Donald Trump if “intensify the air campaign against ISIS” is a good idea without telling him it came from Clinton. He’d probably agree. It’s just a more sophisticated version of his “bomb the shit out of them” rhetoric he uses…

If those head to head polls are meaningless, why do we have them? What’s the point of collecting data if we can’t learn from it?

If every single one of Trump’s scandals got equal attention I would be OK with it.

I recall Scalia’s murder being a campaign promise.

“Obama bribed New York’s attorney general to investigate Trump University”

It’s not baseless. Head to head polls showed that Sanders was more electable.

You know I admired Erik Ericsson for the first time today:

You know that old saying about shoes that may or may not fit? How does that go again?

I think it’s the IRS.