I like hard games too, but I definitely don’t get a high from being exclusively good at time. That’s a very normal/realistic, but ultimately destructive attitude to have in life. 

Why not, Thor 4: All Thor’d up?

Yeah, but if they do “The Talisman,” then “The Black House,” we’ll all just get baited. 

Jesus, why adapt “The Talisman?” Shit is never getting an ending at this point. 

My six axis drifts like a mf, but I did run it into the ground. 

Fair enough, but you do realize that that’s also why a lot of Asians feel racist. It’s because they’re constantly fed a media diet of X race is superior. I get that we have problems in North America, and yeah, a lot of people are giving stars just because they’re dickheads, but quite frankly, Sisi should be giving us…

Well, if you look at the top rated comment, where the commenter was slightly less blunt, the sentiment was essentially the same as mine. Either way, I wasn’t fishing for approval. I’ve been a featured commenter for almost a decade now and I was more than willing to risk being relegated to greys permanently just…

Having extensively travelled in Asia, and being Chinese myself I can tell you with quite a bit of confidence. Am I painting myself with a broad stroke? Yeah, absolutely, but I’d argue that Chinese, and any Confucian culture tends to lean incredibly conservative, and racism tends to be a natural extension of that. Does…

Shit man, if I had that kind of money to burn, I’d bug them about more animal crossing updates. 

I’m not against Chinese people at all. But I mean, if you go to Asia, people are incredibly racist. And there’s really nothing wrong with it because it takes time to change.

I mean, if he’s been acting all this time, he’s a perfect fit. 

Chinese people disliking dark skinned people? Water is wet, maybe... 

Right, but they were lying about the same incident. In the trial is was clear they were both lying about a number of different incidents. The counter suit referred to a very narrow context, but the main suit doesn’t. The character testimonies don’t really go far in proving any of the counts, but seemed to be aimed at…

I don’t see how if he defamed her, she can’t defame him. Nor do I see what has been added by the quote I didn’t finish. Both people can lie with malicious intent.

The jury was ordered to find in the favour of Mr. Depp if.

The case hinged on that only from what we’re seeing on media. There are documents showing that there were multiple criteria on which defamation would have to be proven. There’s a lot of grey area.

I’m not quite seeing the contradiction though. Just because Depp lied about one case of domestic violence doesn’t mean it never happened in their relationship. Having lied about domestic violence that didn’t happen doesn’t mean that it didn’t happen in a general context it would have be proven to show defamation over…

At this point, I figured I must have misunderstood something or you may have misunderstood something about this case, so I went to figure it out. So it seems like Heard’s countersuit is not related to the main suit, or only tangentially, so that’s why there’s no contradiction. I was totally wrong about the linkage…

If I’m not mistaken, she won the counter suit because he was found lying about her staging the domestic abuse, but she was also found not to be abused either (in that particular incident). That contradiction may have influenced the jury because even if she wasn’t abused, the fact that he lied about the stage is…

From what I remember, OP-ED had to be linked to a specific party that Amber held with her friends and the defamation had to be proven in that particular context. And for whatever reason the jury seemed to believe it that she defamed him in that particular police incident.