As far as I know there’s no easy way to change human nature, human nature tends towards bigotry and xenophobia, so running someone who is good at appealing to the good parts of human nature should be our concern.

The point was that you said she was unpopular, but she still garnered that many votes. Still, in the scheme of things it doesn’t fucking matter. How can people keep looking past the fact that almost 63 million people voted for a racist demagogue who literally brags about sexually assaulting women. Maybe the concern…

Still stupid to blame the left for anything. Blame the 60+ million voters who voted for a sexually assaulting racist demagogue. I will never blame someone for not pandering to racists and misogynists.

Hillary got more votes than any other white candidate in history, and came within 72k votes of Obama in ‘12, so she wasn’t that unpopular. It wasn’t the BernieBros either. The problem was that over 60 million people voted for a sexually assaulting old racist white guy, and that’s fucked up.

People tend to forget that over 60 million people voted for someone who bragged about sexually assaulting women because they identified with the old racist white guy. But yeah, let’s keep on blaming everyone else.

Gronk is also always injured.

Lionel Messi-ah

lol, an an appeal to ridicule fallacy? Did you learn debate at Trump U?

Chicago and DC are not closed off to the rest of the US. Guns can be easily obtained in another state and imported to either of those places fairly easily.

21 foot range is when they’re not in a car, so, yeah.

lol

That was so close to making any sense. “A” for effort.

So you’re saying that if the guy approached the car with a knife and the Uber driver pointed a gun at him, he would continue approaching the car? Or would he maybe get back in his van and drive away?

If sales of guns through legal means are harder, there will be less guns on the black market, so the prices of those guns will rise. The black market is an economic ecosystem, and supply and demand is a pretty basic concept of economics. I can’t tell if you’re being serious at this point or if you’re just straight…

You’re missing the point of my argument. People should be able to get certain guns if they go through proper background checks. My point is that there shouldn’t be instances of “good guy with gun vs bad guy with gun,” because “bad guy with gun” should not exist.

Most anti-gun laws don’t help get the gun away from the good guy, that’s a straw man argument. It might make it harder to obtain a gun, but if people really want them then they should have to go through proper background checks. It’s common sense, and even most Americans agree on stricter background checks, laws…

But in truth I would rather it be him than his intended victim or if was a personal case, me or mine.

Or it will make it easier to commit murder and claim self-defense because you know the other person has a gun.

Most anti-gun people wouldn’t want the “bad guy” to have a gun in the first place. Then the “good guy” wouldn’t have to shoot anyone, and nobody would be dead.

Someone’s still dead.