Because we lost by a single goal, which is almost the definition of close when losing.
Because we lost by a single goal, which is almost the definition of close when losing.
Must be nice that FIFA/Premier League have no need for corporate sponsorship. So pure...
The only embarrassing thing for the U. S. during that game was the person at my work who screamed "C'mon Altidore" every time Beasley touched the ball.
The problem with hashtags is that nobody understands that the point of them is so your tweet will show up when users search specific trending topics on Twitter. When you hashtag bullshit that no on else is talking about, you just look like an idiot.
I would like to see him go to Chicago, just to watch all those self-righteous a-holes who've spent the last four years ripping him to shreds line up to fawn over "LeFlop" and "LeChoke", etc. Lebron jerseys will be flying off the shelves. His "loyalty" will no longer be questioned. People will be tying themselves in…
Finally fed up with this so-called "smart" phone, I screamed, "Siri, if you cannot follow my commands, the next thing I'm going to get is a Razr."
He chose his own nickname? That's not how it works! That's not how any of this works!
Except that Alex did no such thing. So, no, you don't understand.
Bradley was pretty effective today when tracking back on defense and disrupting Germany's offensive buildups. He was miserable yet again, though, on the offensive side. No flow going forward, no control of the midfield, bad first touches. He needs to get that part of his game together or the US will be stuck trying…
Bowling is a college sport?
There's a college world series?
I know the lyrics to La Vida Loca because I am familiar with pop culture and the song was played a million times in the 90s, while I was soaking up the knowledge that makes me good at trivia and got me admitted to a pretty good college. That is an unfair generalization, and at the heart of what I dislike about this…
I hate you.
I'll defend Family Feud: It's an interesting game because you're not trying to come up with a correct answer, you're trying to come up with the same answer as a roomful of people. Sometimes they impress you with how smart they are, more often the impress you with how dumb they are. Also, sometimes they come up with…
Yes, they could win, but an intelligent person could solve the puzzle before too many letters get filled on the board.
I said that in response to the comment calling this person a stupid person. I don't understand how facts are pretentious, but whatever. But I always appreciate A+s; I'm used to them but they're always nice.
Yeah, it kind of exactly is.
I actually think there's a lot to be said for your brain's ability to fill in blanks with limited information, rather than just spitting out facts. I think there is intelligence needed to be really good in both shows, and this divide is a matter of some level of pretension.
Depends on the category on Jeopardy. If they have classical music, especially clues where it's all audio, and you're supposed to identify the composer based on that, I grow an extra chromosome. If it's anything sports, movies, world war 2, or US History related, I'm answering before Alex is done reading the clue. I…
My, aren't you the brave young hipster! Let me guess, you don't own a TV, amirite?