juevosrancheros
JuevosRancheros
juevosrancheros

that belichik coaching tree is fools gold.

more like timofey GAUZE-gov.

I think the overwhelming sentiment is "bad cops are bad" not "all cops are bad." You're inventing a group of people to support a narrative you've bought in to or you're legitimizing the argument of a very small group of dumb people. I'm not sure which on is worse.

Just saying something doesn't necessarily mean it's true, y'know. Correlation =\= causation.

If you're asking people to give cops unconditional support despite obvious abuses of power, I'm afraid you live on another fucking planet. Cops getting killed by an unhinged and violent man has a lot less to do with protests (the fact that you can't seperate 'anti cop sentiment' and protesting is telling) and more to

and another thing, a cop's job is inherently dangerous. I'm not saying that cop's deserve to get gunned down but the dangers of their jobs didn't go up due to some protests. There was and always will be an anti authoritative niche. There will also always be mentally unstable people who commit random acts of violence.

"Anti cop" is an interesting way to look at it, considering most sane people want officers held accountable for their use of excessive force. I fail to see how people protesting excessive force used by police officers directly leads to sick fucks killing innocent cops. that is an odd leap to make and no where in your

it absolutely is a straw man argument. There is no legitimate faction of Americans who think it's acceptable to kill cops. You're straining to connect two unrelated events by creating a group of pro cop killers out of whole cloth. That is the definition of a straw man argument and no one owes you a proper rebuttal

Oh. It's an argument all right. A straw man argument.

No one will miss you. Barstool has some likeminded knuckle draggers you can relate to.

People can be outraged by both. I can find both the deaths of Garner, brown, and the cops. People are capable of expressing emotions about many things. You're not naive, just dense.

hating successful dick heads has to be tiring. How do you manage?

yes, but you have the benefit of watching the play numerous times. In real time refs have to make a judgment call and they only call it when it's egregious. I just hate the guffawing by armchair referees who bitch about the sanctity of the game. you can venture in to the greys and see what I'm talking about.

yeah, I don't agree. I was making fun of people like you.

He traveled! There. I saved a bunch of contrarians some time on this beautiful Saturday. You're welcome.

what an odd leap in logic. Thousands of people break laws daily. None of them die (well maybe a few). Hell, that fucker Adam Lanza is still alive despite the fact that he mowed down a bunch of innocent people.

Meh, there's gotta be some middle ground though. That Chris Pratt interview was equally as interesting and he didn't sound like a pretentious knob.

Agreed.

considering his whole piece was one big dick slap to Wise, it shouldn't come as much of a surprise that he was terse with Mr Culturally Tone Deaf in the comments. If you read that and don't take away the main point, it's an exercise in futility to continue a dialogue.

well, when the entitlement and privilege talked about above goes so far over someone's head, it's an exercise in futility to continue the dialogue.