Oy. If two teams have played each other multiple times in the past, are we supposed to talk about what ifs and probabilities and not look at the match up problems the thunder present for the spurs based on those past series? Id rather talk about things that actually happened as opposed to play some silly hypothetical…

ESL? Your insults are about as effective as your critical thinking.

didn't he say that he didn't want black people to be seen with his mistress at Clippers games? That's nba specific. And this slippery slope nonsense is fodder for some paranoid people. Don't want to suffer the consequences of saying abhorrent shit? Don't say it! It's that easy. And I don't know what vacuum the…

That's all well and good, but it's the content of what he said. He was speaking about the NBA specifically, and he was demeaning nearly 90% of the league.

Straw man argument. No one said it's a given. We're giving you shit because you said a team is very unlikely to beat the spurs 4 straight times and this VERY TEAM did that exact thing 2 years ago. You're arguing against a point no one is trying to make.

the post is garnering attention because the Spurs are not the infallible team you're making them out to be. Recent history has proven they have a hard time closing out 7 game series against athletic teams. If it happened two years ago, it's not a "big ask" IMO, it's something that has happened and has a real chance of…

it is absolutely not a right. It's a privilege and there is no gray area on that issue. He agreed to terms with the Nba and he has to follow THEIR rules since his ownership is contingent on a mutually agreed upon set of rules.

I think his point is that the probability of winning 4 games increases with each subsequent win.

this exact same scenario played out two years ago with these exact same teams. It was even the Western Conference Finals, so your argument is as invalid as it is dumb.