Understandable- this piece was so vague about actual details that I went to the NYT and found them (https://www.nytimes.com/2021/10/05/magazine/dorland-v-larson.html). Halfway through the Jez article I had to look for details, came back and finished reading this, and apparently blanked on which article had which info.

If you’re over the age of 15 and would tell someone that you “value their friendship”, and then literally the next day talk mad shit about them in a group text or otherwise you might be a goddamn sociopath. 

FWIW: God only knew that Adam and Eve ate from the Tree of Knowledge when He/Her/They saw the humans clothed and “ashamed of their nakedness”.

This is what happens when cisgender, heterosexual women are kicked out of feminism, and for evidence just look at the Kardashians, the Real Housewives, the moms of TikTokers...but, SPECIFICALLY, their legion of fans.

Hahaha, no, you're a dick. 

But everything is always about you, and what you want right? JFC what a self centered dick. 

The Wi Spa incident, you and another dipshit claimed that “women’s area doesn’t mean penis-free”. That’s your male privilege at play, defending a known sexual predator.

It’s not a surprise that the “person” defending the male sexual predator would also defend/make a joke about a violent, misogynistic extremist group.

Well you’ve made your point- I’m apparently not a welcome ally.

So I’m a transphobe for not wanting to see anyone’s penis in an area specifically designated for women to not have to see penises...well if you’re saying that I’m not an ally, fine. You’ve kicked out another ally.

I empathize with your point, however it is keeping people from having these very necessary discussions. You have been very easy to talk to, but BuriedAliveOpener is jumping on things that aren’t going to help anyone. I’m not okay with an exposed penis in an area that is supposed to be penis-free. There *has* to be…

Trans etiquette says that, and I am taking the cues from their community to understand that neither I, nor others, should be subjected to that in what is considered a safe space. 

This doesn’t happen, like really at all, and so I don’t think a policy change is needed. It’s disgusting to write, but twisted fucks will always exist (mental health issues exacerbated by a lack of mental health care, childhood abuse exacerbated by poverty and lack of healthcare, etc.)

Well Twitter and Facebook accounts from local/state/national drag and trans individuals, the polite etiquette is to not expose male genitals in women’s areas. Darren, according to etiquette, should have kept her bottoms on.

It’s crazy because I’ve read that argument from right-wingers on Facebook using it in a facetious manner. I’ve also read many statements from trans individuals (Facebook-famous people I follow, Twitter feeds, etc.,) who have stated that they felt that it’s rude to expose themselves in areas deemed “women only” because…

I never stereotyped anyone, and am confused as to why you pulled this argument?

She has indecency charges from before she legally changed her gender, and the prosecutor has brought the indecency charges in the Wi Spa case because the claim to be trans (to then gain access to “women’s” only rooms) may not be honest.

Yes, which is in the link that I posted. There are at least three, which is why she’s being prosecuted... everything about her private life indicated to the prosecutor that she’s using the Trans identity to access spaces to expose herself (PRIOR to her legally changing her gender, which is why this is dangerous to…

From LA Mag: Darren Agee Merager has indecency charges going back to 2003, and this point seems very suspect in light of their being upfront about being nude in the room and going into the water, and still having their penis.

I view your response as an EXTREME overreaction, and I'm very confused by the number of people starring your comment.