It was in one of Yost's post-episode chats on Yahoo, I know that for sure. Not sure which one, but it was obviously after Walker bit the dust so that narrows it down a bit.

That's correct. Dillahunt and Graham Yost have said as much.

Wynn Duffy did the outwitting—remember, he's the one who had the "topographical map of Harlan County."

I don't think Boyd knew he was out. He did threaten to kill her to Raylan and I felt like he meant it. But the final scene proves he also still loved her, so that makes it more difficult to say for sure.

Who else wants a quasi-sequel to Out Of Sight and Jackie Brown with Raylan, Jack Foley, Karen Sisco, and Jackie all converging somehow?

You know, I do have to remind you that plenty of women are beaten and abused by their husbands without turning into murderous pimps as a result.

I don't think it was that at all. I think he wanted Raylan to shoot him while he was unarmed.

Boyd was defeated and knew it. He was hoping that Raylan would draw and kill him, because that would make Boyd win.

Somewhere on a beach in Fiji is the following sign: DUFF DIVERS: We Get You Wet And Wild.

Why does Darryl Crowe need a spaceship?

I feel like Season One gets less love because of its semi-episodic nature, but I forgive that based on the fact that: 1. the creators probably didn't know if the show was going to catch on and be a hit; 2. the one-off episodes (especially the one with Alan Ruck as the dentist) are still pretty fucking good.

Unless you have children, the only sensible way of approaching MTV is by pretending it doesn't exist.

I was wondering if I was the only one who noticed this.

I would watch this.

+1

Gore CAN be scary….see 'Martyrs' as an example (and only for that reason).

The idea with the pool was to draw it in, then get out quickly while it was still in the water.

I read that as yet another sledgehammer choice by the director, emphasizing the sexual nature of the threat.

I found the Dostoyevsky allusions incredibly pretentious and on-the-nose for a horror film with a premise so dumb and constricting that it begins violating the "rules" it sets up before the middle of the second act. (Note: There's nothing wrong with horror being dumb as long as it's fun, which this one assuredly is…

I didn't suggest that my opinion was law, only that your view was a minority one. Obviously people can disagree about art.