jpachecofs
Mr Multiverse
jpachecofs

No Ender's Game?

Well, OK, I thought you were going for a bigger discrepancy. But streaks can't really play into this.

I see what you mean, but on the flipside, if we're playing with no streak bonuses, if I'm good, and you're not as good, shouldn't I win (statistically) almost every time anyways?

Availability aside, no, I would pull back, regroup, assess what the apparent disadvantage to my side is, rectify it, and try again. Failing that, find another tactic. I would send in the best equipment regardless of getting beat, because why set myself up for potential failure in the first place.

Another fallacy, there are no classes in CoD. BF and CoD are two separate games with two distinct playstyles. CoD is by no means realistic, and is meant to play as a traditional arcadey shooter. Some people who pick up sniper rifles choose to use them as wildly inaccurate long range shotguns, and that's how they

Yeah, I do, I just think it isn't necessary. I mean, realistically, with Mario Kart, if you're in 8th and have a lap behind, you're done for without the better items (unless magically, every other driver heads off a cliff 3 times in a row). In CoD, I feel like you can easily turn it around on your own, and sure, with

Good point, I had forgotten about Scribs. Again, I'm of the opinion that it simply wouldn't be a big enough deal to go to court over, but I'm sure, as ever, the legal department is looking out for it.

Ha. I have many many many things to tell you, if you're viewing CoD as the pinnacle of real-life battle simulation.

It just seems like it makes each game, I dunno, flat? If that makes sense? With the (re)introduction of deathstreaks, it'd be harder for either side to gain that advantage, because the odd DS would end up statistically leveling the playing field. If we're going for level playing fields, then lets go all the way and

I know, I just wanted to preepmtively poke at the fact that people will be bitching about women shooting/get shot in a game, when men have been doing it for ages, but of course its been perfectly OK for men to shoot/get shot in a game.

I didn't say it isn't cheap, and there's a whole separate debate on whether its the result of a poor level/spawn design and that's how it should be fixed, or if the players should just suck it up and try to get lucky with a grenade or spray 'n' pray, or by introducing artificial aspects like deathstreaks for added

As soon as the scope screen appears, the firing point of the gun is at the center of the screen. If you're quick enough to time that, keeping in mind that your sight is blocked for a good half second while the scope rises, and get a kill, its earned.

They're not naming the game CoD: Cranked, though; its just a game type name, inside a playlist, inside a game mode (multiplayer), inside an actual game. I'm pretty sure its too low level for it to be anywhere near legally infringing.

I get what you're saying, and in reality, it probably is just coming down to personal opinions, but as I stated in another reply, I just felt like deathstreaks were an artificial way of the developer attempting to balance skill levels. I would prefer my games to have rewards based on players earning it, rather than

So is the CS:GO update basically hats?

That's the nature of CTF, though: with the longer respawn timers, it gives the opposite team plenty of time and freedom to set up elaborate spawn traps with nothing to be done about it. Even with deathstreaks, the most I could think of is outlasting it with Juggernaut (but on Hardcore, it would only be an extra bullet

Shhhhh stop making fun of me!

I would say its newer than MW3, and newer than the updates from Blops1 to Blops2, but you're right, obviously they aren't brand spanking new.

...OK? Should I link you to the raft of Asylum-produced knock-off movies that share very similar play on names, and mostly copied content, and none of them have been sued out of existence?