josh924
josh924
josh924

I spent $99.99 CDN on the first DDR game to be released in the US. I bought it from a game retailer that always overcharges at least $10 for everything (for example, I'm sure they're selling a REGULAR copy of Alan Wake for $79.99 new). When I asked why it was so expensive, they said some crap about importing it from

@Rear Admiral Meatwad: Iron Man looks like a kid in a crappy Iron Man costume. And the Hulk looks like a Hulk action figure made to appeal to 6 year olds. Everything else looks great, though.

Holy crap, its looking amazing! And is it me or does Hulk look like he's doing a Focus Attack in pic 2?

@troncoparati: Next up...The Last Negro on Earth, starring Tom Hanks.

I agree 100% with reason 2. I'll never understand why anyone would make a big deal out of what resolution a game is rendered in, especially since 99% of those people who make a big deal out of it probably wouldn't have noticed a damn thing without someone pointing it out to them. Not only that, but unless the

@DominusSapientia: Did the PS3 version of FFXIII have 1024x576 resolution the cutscenes and in-game graphics like the 360 version did? Did it come on multiple discs as well? No? Then how was the PS3 version nerfed?

@Gun Metal Gray: It doesn't have to be 16GB or lower. It just has to be 1GB or higher. It can be way higher than 16GB, but you'll only be able to use 16GB max.

@That mop mutant: They got nearly half a million more sales by making it a multi-platform game. I'm not sure where exactly you think the disappointment would come from, given the situation.

I don't know what BlackLabel3 and keiblerfan69 are talking about, but I've been playing Halo 2 with a friend for over an hour now and we're still finding matches.

@NeöStarr: Whoa-oh-oh-oh-oh-ohhh-oh-oh-oh-ohh, whoa-oh-oh

@The Forgetful Brain: My copy of MW2 works just fine, but I'm still not tempted to buy the map pack for that price. For that price, they'd have to add at least 2 more maps before I'd consider it to be worth 1200 points.

@ModZebra: It used to be 4 maps for 800 points, or at least that's how it was with COD2 and GOW1 (and maybe Lost Planet 1) before Halo 3 fucked that up with 3 maps for 800 points.

@dracosummoner: Really? I'm actually surprised that it wasn't larger. Then again, its probably because I don't play sports games myself.

@NeVeRMoRe666: Obviously not, unless he hates his friends more than he does little racist kids.

@brass2themax: Because taking care of 3 discs for one game is so much harder than taking care of 3 discs for 3 games.

@deanbmmv: "That would mean that for most of the game your characters are constantly chattering."

@eulogy: I agree that she's not all that great looking, but I think she looks pretty good in that video.

@Deunan: I'm not gonna bother with the Sankaku Complex link (since I don't trust them), but the two shots from the other site look way too different to be real, IMO. The lighting, specifically, is way too different. I doubt that there would be a huge difference in lighting between the two versions.

@Platypus Man: This goes against all the previews I've read so far (from 1Up, IGN, and GameSpot specifically). They all say that both versions look more or less the same, with IGN giving a slight edge to the PS3 version and GameSpot giving a slight edge to the 360 version. If the differences were that noticeable,

I've been wondering about something: how come PS3 fanboys (the ones who thought FFXIII should have stayed exclusive, to be specific) keep citing completely unreliable sources that say that the PS3 version looks better than the 360 version? Specifically, I've seen them quoting a random person from NeoGaf and some no