jomonta2
jomonta2
jomonta2

You’re right.

Extraordinarily tough, yes, but still organic. If a shotgun can kill them under the right circumstances I can’t believe that heavier munitions wouldn’t have an effect. Sure, the first days of initial invasion would have been pretty rough for the humans, but it really shouldn’t take long to realize that the things are

For a single family trying to survive on their own in a post-apocalyptical scenario I think the premise of the original movie makes sense. Where the premise begins to fail is when the films try to show you how the monsters destroyed the world in the first place, because once it’s been established that the monsters

I’m ok with this. The Jurassic World franchise was so bad that I’m ok with forgetting it ever happened and letting someone try again.

Got it. I’m unfamiliar with the comics character. But honestly, kudos to casting for finding her and not letting her prosthetic leg be a disqualifier.

How did Marvel even find a deaf Native American woman with a prosthetic leg for this character? Let alone one who is in the proper age range and can act well enough to carry an entire show? Talk about lightning in a bottle... 

For me it’s one of those shows that’s good, but you don’t really enjoy watching it. I’m glad I did, but I’m certainly not running out to tell everyone they must see it.

I’m going to watch the movie and I’m going to hate the movie.

Some day (I dream) HBO will do a proper WWZ mini series. But I actually really like the WWZ movie even if it’s not a good adaptation of the book.

I’d argue that most people over age 30 remember the 2005 film as being a big hit starring Pitt and Jolie. I’m not sure really how one could argue that they didn’t reuse the existing IP for that reason. The name alone practically guarantees a built-in audience. See also: Charlie’s Angels, The Man From U.N.C.L.E.,

Same reason the World War Z movie has almost nothing in common with the World War Z book, name recognition. 

The cat one? 100%.

But it’s 206 minutes long, so at least you’re getting your money’s worth.

He’s the kind of guy who uses the wrong there/their/they’re in his social media posts, which isn’t exactly a marker of someone’s stupidity, but the “dolt” comment probably isn’t completely unwarranted. I’m also a fan of any vaccine awareness campaigns but it should be noted Pfizer reportedly paid him $20 million for

I think Alien and Predator still have promise and more to explore (see ‘Prey’) but it’s the execution that is usually lacking.

No normal person cared about Thanos when he was just an end-credits villain, but when he showed up in Infinity War people cared. Kang has already showed up as the baddie in a movie and he was boring.

Exactly, and that brings me back to my original point from my first post in this thread that “the television shows have become too much to keep up with” is a poor argument. If you’re an MCU fan, then watching a total of twelve episodes of Loki and Secret Invasion, the only MCU shows to come out this year, is pretty

Touché. But I still think there’s a difference between having to see everything to understand and just thinking you have to see everything to understand. 

Exactly, the interconnectedness is a feature for fans. Just like with anything else, the more you put into something the more you’ll get out of it. I still get goosebumps when I see a video on Instagram from inside the theater during Endgame when Cap grabs Thor’s hammer and the audience goes nuts and I get to remember

Isn’t that exactly what the Pattinson Batman movie was? He spent the whole movie playing detective (who strangely never actually solved anything or thwarted any part of the villain’s plan) and the villain was just trying to flood Gotham. I actually really liked The Batman since it was so much more grounded in reality