Yes. Japan-style "circle to confirm" has finally met its match.

Good observation, Nesquikening. Cook definitely has polished his keynote style, just as you describe. He's particularly mastered the art of the calm dramatic pause before revealing a feature.

Yeah but the Kia Rio doesn't have animated emoji

Me too, Nate. Resistance is futile. But at least we are smart enough to realize how dumb we are to want one. We can hold our heads high…?

Ha! It's like the heartlessly computerized average of every human forearm on earth.

The headline was indeed confusing; we're updating it.

Try having fun, it's fun

Good catch, RonG. I'll fix that straight away—thank you!

Good idea! I'm open to other offseason suggestions as well, if people have something in particular they'd like me to cover.

Belichick appeared even more excited about this play than the interception before it! Which makes sense in a way, given that the encroachment foul banished any remaining whisper of a chance for Seattle, but it was still funny to see him out on the field clapping ferociously for a 5-yard penalty after one of the most…

I must have read Cuban's explanation a dozen times, so I'm glad to hear that you came out of it as baffled as I did. It makes me wonder how hard the Shark Tank editors have to work to make him coherent.

I put this on Twitter, but Mom is recovering from an illness; the podcast will return when she's back at 100 percent again. Thanks for asking!

Quite right, btrue, gauge pressure is the kind of pressure we care about in practical terms — that's why the notion of gauge pressure exists in the first place. It's also the same reason the Celsius scale isn't absolute: Absolute zero is not a useful reference point for most practical applications. But if you are…

Although the timestamp now says Jan. 25 (perhaps because the post was updated), I think that Hondo posted the initial version of the post before Belichick's Saturday presser, which might be why he doesn't respond to Belichick's specific arguments. Not sure about that; I just recall reading that post before Saturday.

No offense taken; it was a perfectly cromulent question.

Once?

My scientific background is knowing how the ideal gas law works. Tyson knows how it works, too, obviously, but he plugged in the wrong numbers — a 15-percent drop in pressure simply isn't the reality here. You don't need special credentials to make observations of fact, as Tyson himself would tell you.

I do not disagree.

This is my work; I've been steeped in Deflate-gate for the last week and immediately spotted that NDGT had treated gauge pressure as absolute pressure. I'm not the only one to notice it, though; there are now other people replying to him on Twitter who note the discrepancy.

I only respond to closed questions