They’s definitely the commercial model that has certain restrictions the retail models don’t come with. I forget exactly what it is but I went through the same thing with the Samsung I bought. They’re basically for commercial use like at bars or screens in stores or whatever. They really can’t be used for home use…

Thank you for the response.

I’ve been eyeing the C7 for a while now and am waiting until black friday. Right now they’re hovering around $3,200, down from $4,500 at launch. I’m betting they’ll go under $3,000 on black friday.

Oh you’re a lawyer, I dislike you already; not before but yes, now.

Actually, people like you and your inability to comprehend even basic constitutional law cause me and every other lawyer in the country a great deal of agitation.

Take your meds.

Did you know that words can have more than one meaning? I know this must be an earth shattering revelation, but it is true.

You say “most often” like you have any actual data to back up that assertion. Do you have any data? Because, I think you might be pulling that out of thin air.

You’re irony impaired, aren’t you? You go on a diatribe about condescending to people in a diatribe where your words are dripping with condescension.

I know! Can you believe this guy “nickleberry?” He has no concept of the 2nd Amendment, doesn’t understand the history of the United States nor Supreme Court precedent and is actually arguing against someone who has drafted federal court opinions on the Constitution?

So, you admit you’re out of your element and have no idea what you’re talking about? Thank you for conceding your ignorance.

It was well understood that a state had plenary authority to regulate guns, unencumbered by the Constitution. Why? Because until 2010, the 2nd Amendment was not incorporated into the 14th Amendment. Let me repeat that: The 2nd Amendment WAS NOT incorporated into the 14th Amendment.

Canada loves highly educated immigrants who can pay taxes, as do most European countries.

Yes, the right (singular) belongs to the people (collective plural). See what I did there? I used the English language as commonly and properly understood.

Yes, I know, that’s what gun nuts do.

Oh, you want to play that game?

If you’re a gun nut, I get it. If, however, you think the Constitution should be interpreted based on precedent as well as how society evolves, then this decision is antithetical to 200+ years of jurisprudence and the plain text of the Constitution, not to mention contrary to the Federalist Papers, which explained…

They were only “military equivalent” because that’s the only kind of muskets available, whether you were a farmer or in the military. In fact, in the colonies, the army was made up of farmers and the like. So, “military” equipment was that of non-military members, because they brought their own equipment.

Yes, Heller, the decision contrary to 200+ years of judicial precedent written by a whack job ideologue. That’s not something I’d hang my hat on, if I were you. That’s like holding up the Dred Scott decision as the apex of civil rights decisions.

Well, that’s what they had available in 1791. http://www.businessinsider.com/the-right-to-bear-arms-2012-7