Why is she sitting on a wooden pallet inside of a giant paper bag?

I predict comments predicting more comments of shit show comment predictions.

I predict there will be more comments predicting a shit show than actual shit show comments.

My only thought is this: examining violence in games, and how we react to it and why is important, but it's hard for me to muster that effort when there's something about this game feels fundamentally dishonest. I realize that may sound absurd, but... it screams marketing gimmick, and not a very good one at that—I…

Flounder? I hardly know her!

Eh? Eh?

"What is privacy again?"

People do suffer from schizophrenia and other diseases who don't have 'something behind (their) behavior.' It is not helpful to suggest that everyone who has a mental illness was victimized.

"Privacy watchdogs contend these sites aren't clearly communicating to users that their images could be scanned in bulk or downloaded for marketing purposes."

That doesn't mean they're lying either. These cases are very complicated, which is why people should probably stay out of it and let authorities handle it before making their own minds up without having personally witnessed anything.

Whoa whoa whoa. Those are a lot of assumptions right there and you don't know this family. Settle down and don't be part of the angry mob. Famous girl or not, you do not know her or her family. This situation is not for our public entertainment, you are not mental health professional, and you don't need to go out…

I know, it's so sad. Shia LaBoeuf has also accused his parents of abuse and Jez is still treating his meltdowns as "wacky celebrity antics" (as they did with Amanda Bynes for a long time). I wonder how many breakdowns, overdoses and deaths it will take before we realize many of these ex-child stars are acting out from…

It's not child pornography if she looks like she's over 18

On topic: It might seem to compelling to you to argue that images don't count as child pornography if you personally can be convinced that the subjects are over 18, but the only determining factor that actually matters, in point of fact, is whether or not they are goddamned children.

That's what's being telegraphed by your attitude: everyone who has sex wants children. Except I doubt seriously most of these "bros" or their sex partners want that.

More or less sperm production doesn't affect overall cum volume, so why would anyone care?

Why doesn't the article mention how may states have literally never had to deal with this issue? In what universe would a U.S. state create a law for a scenario which had never arisen within its borders?

I think they're more concerned about what's in your uterus in this case, though. If they truly believe that an unborn child is a human being entitled to rights, then you can see where their way of thinking comes from (dumb as it may be)

It's a riddle, wrapped in a mystery, covered in smegma.

why do I not believe this, either?