As your preschool teacher would've said, "We use our words, here, Sipowitz." If you can't hack together an argument, you wind up looking like an even bigger ass than you seem to think I am.
Joe S
joeszzz
You had one wafer-thin mint too many, eh?
Is it possible that you're referring to people who have had enough sex to become casual about it? Cause that would mean you're dealing with people who already have a distorted view of sex that revolves entirely around their own experience, which is problematic since sex is inherently a 2-party (or larger) occurrence.
I think you might be missing my point. I would never claim that my own abstinence shields me from all effects of romantic relationships and attachments. I felt I made it clear that I still screw up in all sorts of ways, and have to deal with the consequences.
You would be in the minority, then. Because most people would agree that sex intensifies their relationships. I'm sure it varies in extent, but that's hardly the point.
You've probably eaten to much a few times, too, but you're still here.
I don't claim to have experience. I claim to have knowledge. The distinction is obvious. The knowledge comes from any psychologist's take, and everyone I know who has shared about their experiences with me. You don't have to get shot to know that it hurts. This subject is no different than any other. If you can't…
Are you saying that it doesn't? Because most people I know have had sex, and they all agree that it upped the ante. Who cares where I get my data from? The facts are the facts.
It's literally a foregone conclusion that sex intensifies relationships. Ask any psychiatrist or psychologist. Attacking me doesn't negate my argument. Only logic can do that. Sorry.
Your argument is flawed.
Your use of the word "Neckbeard" makes it obvious that you're only interested in the most unbiased of info. Well done.
I should note, I was taught by my father to never hit a woman no matter what she does to you, unless your life or health is in real danger, and you can't otherwise get the abuse to stop. I still believe that. It's not about excusing women, or treating them differently from an emotional standpoint. It's purely about…
Oooh. Yeah, except with the fact that the opposite is currently believed to be true. Everyone knows this. The difference is that women tend to be in worse shape for it.
Even with all the comments saying how this is "frivolous," there is a massive deficit of empathy in this comment section. If this were the girl being forced to photograph herself, you people would be flipping fucking shit, and rightly so. Why not do it for the boy? He's a fucking child.
If the men are "whining", then aren't the women doing the same thing? What made you choose one word for women and another for men? Sexism, perhaps?
The factors used to rank states are hilariously wrong. Very poor sociology.
Pregnancy is a status of the woman. Life is a status of the embryo. A real scientist or doctor knows this. Only armchair scientists like yourself are unaware of the distinction and its importance. A pregnancy cannot be aborted. An embryo, however, can be. That's the distinction you see in the words themselves, and…
They do. Doctors do. "Ask your doctor if you are healthy enough for sex." There are even certain types of sex they will say are healthy and others they will say are not. Did you somehow miss the first part of the sentence?
It still is their money, and they are allowed to determine the compensation packages they offer. Just because a woman can spend her paycheck from Hobby Lobby on these drugs does not make it the same thing. The net effect is not the only important aspect. The morality of the details matters.