"Both are unscientific claims, it's highly bigoted." < I would argue that it is your claim that is unscientific. There is no question that males evolved to mate with females. Biologically, this is undeniable so please do not try. Mentally, there is a valid argument to be made given the inherent difficulties this…

Firstly, homophobia is a strange claim. However, he does admit to homosexuality as being a disorder biologically and maybe mentally as well. That still doesn't support your claim.

And I pointed out how it was irrelevant to this topic. Just an observation.

You are using the term "human rights" wrong. None of what the transgender people are fighting for are human rights in any way. This bathroom stuff is just coercion from the federal government to force a behavior upon society that is not organic or based in reality. Nor is any sort of medical treatment for dealing…

So now you suggest that it is our responsibility to police other cultures? This is a whole different topic about sovereignty and I do not advocate taking that on in anyway. What is in question here is how we treat out own gays within our culture and how we add to it from the outside.

"I'm simply pointing it out to show that he doesn't have any real values." I don't think it is fair to claim he doesn't have real values just because he points out the fallacies of transgendered activists. There are very valid reasons to shut-down illogical Social justice Warriors as rudely as possible.

I think the issue is complex. I'm not sure what to do, but I would not be doing what Obama or Merkel did. The entire refugee crisis is going to go away soon enough now that Obama is gone. The only reason this was needed was because of his funding of ISIS "moderates" to do the dirty work of removing Assad. If we…

The delay in my posts appearing on the page led me to post twice. Slightly different take on both so I'll leave them there.
Milo has disagreements with some transgender activists. That hardly reflects his views on human rights. He attacks what he perceives as being false. He does a good job in my opinion. People…

"It's only logically sound if we assume that ALL the people coming from those countries share the same values." Wrong, it is logically sound even if as little as 20% hold these beliefs.
Secondly, you are conflating offensive speech with violence which is not logical. Free speech is the alternative to violence.

"It's only logically sound if we assume that ALL the people coming from those countries share the same values." True, but the assumption is logical and based on the well known events I mentioned in my previous post. Therefore, the argument is legitimate. The question is what should be done about it, not wether or…

"It's only logically sound if we assume that ALL the people coming from those countries share the same values." Absolutely right! I'm so pleased to see a valid response. But this assumption is not illogical. It is based on the fact I mentioned earlier about the culture that created the oppression. Now the real…

Yes, it is. You obviously haven't been paying attention. His concern about importing people from a culture who is responsible for creating those conditions in their Country's of origin is logically valid and cannot be logically construed as bigotry.

Logical arguments must be based on core chosen values. So in his case, if you value human life and that this value extends to gays, then criticism of the execution of gays in Islamic nations is logically valid. If you do not value the life of gays, then you could logically disagree with his position.

I'm referring to this thread and the comments within it. No effort is made in countering his arguments, and the response is entirely emotionally driven. Your behavior is why the left has lost and will continue to lose. I'm not against Liberalism as an ideal, but you guys are just not making good arguments about…

I think he is pointing out the fragility of the left which ultimately should make them stronger if they rise to the occasion. So far, it's been hilarious.

You prove my point. Instead of evaluating the rationale behind his election you stick your head in the sand and claim a vast segment of the population has lost their minds. The left used to make sense at least half the time. Now it's just pure trash.

That was gross. Still, it is not as if that is what he is touring the nation about. I think he is pointing out the fragility of the left which ultimately should make them stronger if they rise to the occasion. So far, it's been hilarious.

that's because conservatives tend to adhere to reality much more than liberals. The very nature of liberalism is to depart from well established norms. Both need each other but in a political context it it's vital and tradition that liberals not be allowed to conduct policy because they really don't have a clue…

He makes money by triggering idiots who cannot handle any criticism. Brilliant. Best job ever!

Milo is awesome!