Seems like an entertaining character, and the developer sounds like an absolute pussy, but it’s their game and their rules. The suspension should stand, and Dr. D should play it off as his character would; what’s the point of being a rebel if no one is persecuting you for it.

Regarding the second letter; just confess the whole thing.

If this were true, I could understand a dopey senile old man making that mistake, but what kind of Mall Kiosk attorney did he hire to actually move this case forward based on a fan video.

Fixing dumb people is just my lot in life. Don’t miss this rare opportunity to be fixed for free.

Dog shit isn’t food.

lol, good for you. My advice was to prevent everyone from thinking you’re dumb, not just me. Consider it; it may just change your life.

I could use a nap, but all I did was offer you some useful advice. You don’t like that people think you’re an idiot, right? Wouldn’t you like to change that?

Ask? You mean kick and scream about it like a bunch of pre-teen morons? Maybe if you all didn’t try to frame every stupid little thing you don’t like as an absolute travesty, then people wouldn’t just disregard you as idiots.

You people throw these “answers” to the situation around like you were there. Just walking away leaving the mentally deranged woman, wielding a knife, alone with her children probably isn’t a good idea.

A mentally ill woman attacks cops with a knife and gets shot...

My estimation is that most people don’t need or want self-righteous, moralizing zealots filtering their content for them. As an adult I at least feel like I’m capable of deciding what I can and can’t handle on my own. I guess I can’t prove the majority of gamers agree with me, though.

Gamergaters are just the idiotic extremists on one side; just like the SJW fascist morons goose-stepping on the other side.

Pressure from special interests, at the very least, is an observable growing trend in our culture, same as many industries are visibly, and not very subtly, going out of their way to appease them.

Tech advancements are unrelated to the effect censorship has on the industry. Your assertion that the increase in variety caused by technology means that censorship isn’t a looming problem is a red herring; you’re using it as evidence to something it’s completely unrelated to.

Which part? Buckling to special interests being a cultural mandate is just fact, and the rest is simple causality.

The amount of games you can buy now has increased because of technological advancements; it has nothing to do with what we’re talking about. Censorship doesn’t create more freedom and variety in the industry.

Video games are more varied and played by more people because of technological advances.

If you’re happy with the changes then kudos; no one’s saying you have to feel the same way as anyone else about this kind of censorship.

Because it’s often used to make fallacious connections, not because it’s a concept that can’t be applied to anything.

There’s a special interest behind nearly everything that could be viewed as offensive. “it’s kind of creepy” is fine as an opinion, but not as a grounds to have something removed.