This is what you get when you try to seriously reply to a troll who starts his argument by attacking a nonsensical strawman.  Unless you intend to mock said troll, I’d suggest saving your arguments for someone else.

I’d like to see the strawman come back from THAT blistering takedown!

Despite being articulate, good looking, well educated, and thoughtful, Pete Buttigieg is a terrible Democrat.  He’s savvier than Joe Biden, but just as milquetoast.  We need better with the whole world catching fire right now.

A million times worse is when the parents of the winning team keep celebrating the 1th, 12th, 13th, and 14th goals as though their team just sealed a victory in the World Cup Championship game.  I’ve gone over to those parents and reminded them that there are 10yo girls out there having an awful time.  Maybe save your…

He also once said he deserves two more years because Dems wasted his first two years pursuing their witch hunt.  Prepare for him to push the election til 2022 and the Senate to do nothing and Nancy Pelosi to start talking about beating him in 2022 instead of impeaching him.

For white people it means “I don’t see color(ed people as human beings).”

Because only the people who are terrified and believe violent crime is on the rise buy guns.

I just wish people would learn to turn their phones to take landscape videos.

... starring Oscar nominee Samuel L. Jackson (Pulp Fiction, Kong: Skull Island)...

There was never any chance she was going to be outclassed in the debate.

Well, than you’re stupid and a troll.  That’s no way to go through life, son.

Ladies and gentlemen of the jury I present exhibit... what letter are we up to now? This is troll reply #273 to a joke post, so that’s... uh... BBBBBBBBBBM, I think.

Thanks for making my point in another reply. I expected you to be grey because your posts are typically dumb and troll-y.

More because his points are typically dumb and troll-y.  But potato, potato.

Wow.  You’re not grey?  Crazy.

Until we roll out the guillotines I’ll have to accept these kinds of stories to keep me warm at night.

The Hatch Act is a limit on the 1st Amendment.  That’s why it’s by definition a violation of the 1st Amendment.  So arguing that her 1st Amendment rights are being restricted is both correct and irrelevant.

No matter how many chickens come home she’ll still go to sleep comfortably on a giant pile of money she made from her awfulness.  The pile just won’t get larger at the same rate.

One of the major underlying issues is that most of these cities did not sign contracts with the campaign but instead believed the goodwill they extended would be impetus enough for the campaign to pay up.

But that’s like calling a murder an assault.  Sure it’s included in there, but it aint the headline.