jkmityo
Jkmityo
jkmityo

Activision and Giuliani celebrated their victory by blasting Twister Sister's "We're Not Going to Take It" on enormous U.S. Army loudspeakers outside Noriega's prison cell for five straight days.

This ruling should set precedent to throw out Lindsay Lohan's identical suit against Rockstar Games for Grand Theft Auto 5. One hopes.

But the lawsuit against California strawberries drags on...

Cosplay? Looks like photo mode from the game... Well done!

I always saw it as a digital couch where you virtually pass the remote to your friends.

But.. you CAN share games, as long as you're still playing. Your friend doesn't need to own the game to play.

THIS IS FRIGGIN AWESOME

Y'know, I remember when everyone was squalling about the end of "game sharing" on the XBox One following their capitulation relative to their DRM policies.

The idea that a company—ANY company—would purposefully allow potential customers to utilize a for-profit-product for free out of the goodness of their hearts is

Uncharted 2: the most amazing cinematic experience i ever played.

It doesn't matter what the world population is, what matters is who is buying your games. Even when you consider that women are playing games more nowadays, that's usually because mobile games like "candy crush" (does that game have a female protag? I never played it) are included. But the games that are being

The gender proportion of the general population has absolutely zero relevancy to the target audience for the types of games that are widely criticized by feminist gaming critics. They are still overwhelmingly male.

If games are only targeted for the straight white misogynist portion of 30% (which would be less again unless you honestly believe that all white men hate women) then why is game development such a lucrative business?

"The thing that is absolutely stupid about GamerGate is that it treats women like objects to be owned and silenced via harassment and threats of violence on the grounds that it is unfair to say that women in games shouldn't be treated as objects, property, silent bit parts, and targets of harassment and violence."

So

Oh fuck YOU and your endless victim complex. So what if women are 51% of the population? That has no bearing on how many of them buy games, which is next to none! And don't bother trying to trot out cooked-up statistics by the ESA that make the number of women playing games seem close to the number of men. They're

Except women not having decent representation hasn't harmed the industry in a profit sense (in the easy to interpret stats that most companies look at and show investors). Gross wise games are doing great on the same demographics targeting that has been the norm since the 80's. And while women make up roughly 46% of

And what do you think provides the capital for those salaries? And even if it only affected the higher ups do you think they wouldn't dictate what gets published in a way that best supports them?

Probably the same as people who attack say Fox News (as an extreme). Or folks who don't like something a network they like runs (as a less extreme example). You say that he's a pretty common commentor so assumably other than the gamergate thing he is a fan of Kotaku. So one would assume that he hopes the pressure from

You might want to watch that second person "you" when speaking about the straight-white male demographic. I'm a minority. A bisexual Mestiço, particularly. #NotYourShield

Take just a moment to not mis-identify those you're arguing with, and perhaps people will... not take you for a moron!

The end game is simple. When I buy a part for my Beamer, or a box of Macaroni and Cheese, or a new Intel Mac, I don't want any of that money, however small that fractional amount, going to a publication site that I've taken umbrage to because of what I perceive to be reprehensible behavior.

It's called "being a