There should be no way they can just rest on “but we said they need to stay attentive”. And yet they are.

The probe concluded that Tesla paired a “weak driver engagement system” with a “misleading” name in Autopilot, reports the Verge. As such, “Tesla’s products lure drivers into thinking they are more capable than they are,” the site adds.

It’s interesting how ships have life cycles closer to buildings than vehicles. Even the most utilitarian vessel is built with a life cycle of decades in mind, and will be expanded and updated throughout that time. For instance the cargo ship St. Mary’s Challenger was built in 1906, worked the Great Lakes as a cargo…

Not for me, but accounting for the condition and fandom, NP.

I’ve always liked these, just not at $9000 for 20 years old.

$9K for a 20yo Chrysler product from THE WORST era of Chrysler products? Oh dear God no. CP supreme.

The only reason this still looks good is it was never driven. And probably for good reason.

ND simply because it is a Chrysler product. 

A dozen cops for one stolen ca . . . Oh.

Between that and whatever they’re spending on this ridiculous inchoate “Robo-Taxi” thing (even $1 would be too much), at the expense of the cheap widely-affordable option that they should be developing, Musk is driving them directly into a wall, just like an Autopilot.

Imagine if Tesla had spent all the money that went towards the Cybertruck on something that wasn’t dumb as fuck.  They could have made a damn impressive vehicle.

Having a bridge with supports in a major waterway without barriers seems like a bad idea.

16 million empty houses in America.

Norfolk Southern and Boeing must be grateful for the distraction.

When I read “coolest version of the most boring car” and saw the shape, I immediately thought it was this at first:

The whole “individual buyers rejecting EVs, and automakers supplementing with more gas-burning cars” thing feels like perhaps a bad sign for the state of the world. Remember snow? I remember snow. I’m not sure the Zoomers will, though.

Yikes. It should be eminently restorable, though.

The facts won’t generate outrage and clicks.

Looking at the bridge on a satellite image, there are significant breakwaters around the base of each tower and those towers look like they’re in water too shallow for most cargo vessels. And when I looked at them on a marine chart, the water around the bases is less than 30 feet. A modern cargo ship will run aground…

Given the state of things, perhaps the “fix” to the ship involved baling wire. But we know that any copy editors that GMG might have employed bailed out a long time ago.