“It was amazing to be there on the airfield when the missiles arrived. Which I totally was. Promise. For NBC News, this is Brian Williams.”

You know Hillary Clinton advocated for a stronger military response, right?

That’s why many people are not entirely aboard the claim that Assad’s military staged this gas attack. If Assad is personally responsible for this, then he’s gotta be the biggest idiot in the world, and I just doubt that British-educated surgeon who also seen what happens to his neighbors only for allegedly possessing…

CNN will report the wildest unconfirmed speculation if it serves their agenda.

I’m glad everyone is so accepting of the idea that the US is absolutely, positively correct that this was a sarin attack by Assad’s forces. Because, you know, it’s not like our government has lied or concealed the truth before in order to justify a war.

I had the same thought. What good reason did Assad have to use chemical weapons in the first place? Just doesn’t make sense to me.

Today Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump agreed on the same action. I’m willing to believe that this was bigger than D vs R back in Washington.

Hot take: maybe the evil, hateful Republicans wanted to send a message to the guy who just gassed a bunch of kids.

While I completely agree with you, taking in refugees doesn’t solve the root problem.

Where in the world did you get the impression that Obama didn’t drop any bombs in Syria?

I’m going err on the side that doesn’t involve killing human beings, but instead destroys military equipment used for the prior stated purpose.

The launched missiles were to destroy an airstrip so planes carryimg chemical weapons can’t take off. Maybe they took out some of the planes and weapons in the process.

Or he could sit around picking his nose not following through on idle threats like Obama did when Assad used chemical weapons on his own people. But I’m sure your idea is good too.

As someone who is generally anti-launching missiles at sovereign nations and also anti-gassing innocent civilians, what is the correct moral stance here? I’m kind of thinking providing a disincentive to using chemical weapons is... good?

This was my exact thought.

“Hey, Steph Curry wants to play a game of H-O-R-S-E for money. Who’s in?”

*looks at leaderboard*

So this is going to fuck Democrats. Because Gorsuch is a fucking creep, I get wanting to keep him out. He’s presided over shitty rulings (lookin at you Hobby fuckin Lobby). He is, however, a very popular pick on the right, for all the reasons the left doesn’t like him. There’s nary a Republican who has cast a vote…

Oh, it sounds familiar, all right. And since we’re already part-way there, I’ll just throw this in, and wait for the calls of ‘racist’ to come pouring in.

Oh, they may yet turn out to be just that. The pages are not yet written on what the endless war they caused will do to all of our futures....

My best friend and I went as dick Cheney and the guy he shot in the face that year for Holloween. We one the contest.