jimtkruk
J.T.
jimtkruk

I read the headline three times and couldn’t understand why Jim Kelly was involved in this.

Hey Rachel, it’s already been said in the comments over and over, but I can’t help myself: THIS ISN’T A LEGGINGS BAN! IT ISN’T SEXUALIZING CHILDREN’S BODIES! IT ISN’T A MICROAGRESSION! If these were revenue passengers, you’d be totally correct! But they’re not. I brought my son to court with me a few weeks ago

I haven’t watched it, and I have friends who have and couldn’t finish because they found certain parts, especially gay and trans issues, too offensive. Don’t know if the friend even got to the Cosby stuff. But I do see some evidence of Dave doing something he’s always done - he makes a comment that shocks you, then

OK, how many of those were CNN? And we all know CNN is fake news. So that doesn’t count. If fake news covers real news, that doesn’t count. Everyone knows this. You would know this if you weren’t part of the lying press.

I agree with puke. This does come from someone notoriously bad with puke (when I was a kid my dog puked on me in the back seat of the car, which made me puke all over myself. My dad pulled the car over, a cop pulled up to see what was going on, it was like a mini-episode of the frank n beans scene from Something

Actually, the one thing that I found most interesting was listening to his locker room interview - he said “I don’t plan on doing it again, but...” You can hear the recognition that he really doesn’t want to do this, he probably doesn’t know how to stop himself from doing this because he’s worked on learning how to

People referenced it in this thread, I said it in another comment: you can’t act in bad faith because it’s an implied covenant. It doesn’t matter if it just says “operable,” if this is a contract, you can’t intentionally try to hurt VW. This type of principle applies in lots of areas of law - if you’re not an expert

Probably been said already, but I’m not reading 953 replies to find out - I’m not a contract lawyer, but there’s generally an implied covenant of good faith in all contracts, and I would think that would extend to a deal like this. This is clearly bad faith - if I was going to do something like this, I definitely

I’m getting really frustrated with people not understanding the concept of statistical analysis. And really really frustrated with people ‘blaiming’ Silver and telling him he’s ‘already atthe bottom, the only place he can go is up.’ They are pretty happy with what they did - they were the only outlet that warned

I think you’re doing what you were doing before (and this is coming from someone who likes reading your work): you’re reading your own hopeful message into his appearance. He basically has RBF and you’re thinking it means he’s miserable. I’m sure he’s been lead on tours of all sorts of places - people want to show

It’s already been said, but your criticism is asinine. You said that he has “no fucking idea.” He would admit that! It’s like you’re looking for a binary prediction and if you don’t get it right, you don’t know what you’re talking about. He’s said that right now Trump has about a 1-3 chance of winning, and the

Can we stop ignoring the real issue here? WHAT THE FUCK IS WITH YOUR LOCK SCREEN PICTURE??

Fuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuck no.

I was thinking that too! But still too many problems with it being Pitt. In particular he just didn’t seem to have that much of a connection with

Yes, so sorry that I didn’t live up to your journalistic standards in my completely speculative reply to a blog post about a blind gossip item.

Cruise has adopted children in addition to the biological one.

“Bad boy” was talking about a different article - the one where Sheen was HIV positive. But someone in another comment does mention that Jez seems to have suggestively included info about Sheen. Not to say that I’d be disappointed if it was him (don’t want anyone to be involved in this so I don’t ‘hope’ it’s any

Oh god no oh god no oh god no. It just can’t be, right? That’s the first name that popped into my mind (with the “revered by millions”). But there are a few problems with that. First, said he was raped on set but Hanks was never in a movie with him. Second, usually these are all hints at something: mentioning

I 1/10 agree with this. I 9/10 agree with this in general, but 1/20 agree in the case of Trump.