I’m pretty familiar with asylum law. I think I can win that case. You usually have to show that the persecution was either by the government or by a person/group the government is unable or unwilling to control. I’d say there’s a strong case for “unable or unwilling” at this point.

The 6th suggestion is clearly the most effective. 8th might be a close second, but nothing is more unattractive/irritating than sub-professional level improv. Except maybe those people talking about their sub-professional level improv. Even a good person can fall off the path, but nobody can resist the disgust of bad…

Visually, this barely works for her. It's the kind of dress I usually hate and it seems like it would be good for most to stay away from it because pulling this off is an extremely high degree of difficulty.

"Innocent until proven guilty." In the court's eyes, she was still innocent. In the absence of evidence showing that she would be a flight risk - which has clearly been established at this point - this is the result of living in a democracy. Sucks in a case like this, but this is the rare case. The only solution…