jimrockford95--disqus
This Is Jim Rockford...
jimrockford95--disqus

I think licensing issues with the supporting cast lead to them dropping the more overt connections, as far as I know the original trilogy is all within the public domain but everything from "Daughter of…" up is still under copyright.

"The Fiendish Doctor SJW is attacking us with his basic respect for people, THE MONSTER!"

Honestly I'm mainly responding to you because every post in a nugget of fanboy hilarity, you started on a basic misunderstanding of how reviews work, doubled down on that and then really went out of your way to highlight the fact you didn't read 3 of the 4 reviews featured or outright misread the one you did for the

"The only criticism I've ever seen on this site was for mainstream books," kid you really don't need to constantly reiterate you only read the DC reviews on the site, maybe the Marvel ones if you need a bit of ground to stand on. You really should take the time to read the reviews featured above before making such a

Come on you reds!

That's my big issue with the DC films, even when a character is cast well enough I still can't shake the feeling that someone else cold have done the job better.

* Sympathy for the Devil plays* Are you the devil?

Did you read the most recent issue of Seven Days in Mayhem, McCaffrey draws the hell out of Newman's vision of the London Underworld.

I think Moore and Newman hit on the right idea by having him be a more nebulous background presence rather than a direct cackling threat, gives the character a sense of gravitas and genuine threat you wouldn't have if he appeared as an outright yellow peril figure.

Remind me, are we still on the Logan's Run system or have I have I unlawfully killed a bunch of people?

Don't be crazy, Sci-Fi films exist in a vacuum clearly and are in no way drawing from the present day problems and all.

"just committed out his opinion" oh no a reviewer doing what reviews are supposed to, how did you cope with a comic you enjoyed despite it's lack of quality getting a fair judgement rather than blind praise by fanboys.

I prefer the classic model if only for the fact that there's at least a solid characterisation behind him. Nu52 Supes changed personalty about five or six times across his solo title before we even get into whoever the fuck Johns was writing in Justice League.

I dunno, I'm always with Warren Ellis on the whole thing of Lois Lane being the key factor in what makes Superman work, the Nu52 fucked that up impressively among other things.

I thought Agents of ATLAS dealt with it pretty well, it helps that Jimmy Woo is the lead and has always been one of the more overtly progressive golden age depictions of Chinese-Americans.

Maurcie Klaw has the added bonus of being boring as hell alongside Rohmer's usual bullshit. He's called the fucking Dream Detective and he investigates fucking statue theft.

There's an arc in Sandman Mystery Theater that due to a colouring error did that to all the Asian characters featured in it, how no one thought that it was a bit odd never ceases to amaze me.

That you quite reviews with a jury really says a lot, these books aren't or trial and you really should know that. You're asking for Wikipedia summaries instead of reviews but I'm sure you know that, and if you're going to try and present it as a bias maybe use two books that weren't appalling bad like #21 and #0.

You reading comprehension is astoundingly bad, that you've manged to infer some sort of hate on against cape comics because they should be held to the same standard as anything else really strengthens the fact that you can't deal with basic criticism towards the book

You list a few reviews but nothing you say actually suggests you understand the reviewing process, particularly when you attempt to suggest that a review divorced from personal opinion is something that's possible outside of the minds of a few deluded children.