There's certainly some value in just previewing it, but if you generally don't have that much to get across to the other party, and you're really concerned about writing it in the most concise way possible, I'd definitely consider drafting it on your phone as well.

Because they're receiving a benefit (income) that's not benefitting anyone who relies on that income stream. It makes perfect sense. Premiums for spouses and dependents are both deductible - domestic partners are not. As the fake domestic partner scamming the health insurance company, I think with all of yours…

I'm trying really hard to see the health insurance "idea" as anything short of pure fraud, but I'm struggling. While you and your friend may qualify as a domestic partnership (you share a toaster, etc.), I highly doubt you're fulfilling the roles originally intended by the lawmakers - i.e. you're abusing a loophole. …

Because e-mails are far more convenient than texts. Because texting is far more personal. Because you may not have the phone number of the person you're trying to reach out to. Because it's in your best interest to get to the point fast and make your e-mail as tiny as possible if you want a very busy person to read…

Composing on the smartphone versus simply previewing it on the smartphone is key to me. No matter how good your soft keyboard is, typing on it still sucks compared to a full-sized hard keyboard. When you're forced to draft a message on one, you'll naturally get to the point as fast as possible, and you'll be forced…

People often complain about the price of drinks, but fail to consider the surrounding atmosphere and other factors that contribute to the different markups (which can vary greatly from bar to bar). Here in NYC, if you consider all mixed drinks equal (which they're not), you may pay from around $8 all the way up to…

Ah, so that's what I was missing in your original post. It sounds like you feel that that upbringing was beneficial to you, which makes perfect sense that you'd want it for your children then. Glad it worked out!

hehe makes perfect sense!

Wasn't that a tough life? Why would you want to make your children's lives equally as tough? You're angry at your parents, but taking it out on your children. That doesn't really make any sense.

Where's the change in the passenger-side cup holder going?

This is total BS. Assuming that the parents do not die "early", they should be passing while their children are middle aged or older. By that time, haven't they already assigned their own value to money? They're adults at that point. If the parents did a good job parenting, that inheritance would be put to good…

Thought the exact same thing as I read this. I couldn't help but notice that the author equates the three Republicans with two convicted criminals, but I'm sure we're to believe that there's no bias here.

That is probably the greatest compliment I've ever received.

"How do you feel about abortion?"

Figure out how they're associating you with your banned account. Phone number? Name? E-mail? Then don't use that when you sign back up again :)

That's absolutely true, hence the powerful combination of the two, and why I always advocate passphrases over passwords.

This incident may help people answer the following questions:

That's what I was referring to as a "password". I was translating from Apple terminology to what everyone else on Earth calls it :)

Yep - my thoughts exactly. Now, with Apple's keychain, if that's behind the fingerprint, people could get into a security issue there, but using 1Password is a solid solution.

Yup, it definitely is. Fingerprint authentication on a specific device as the second factor would be cool, though. That would technically be more secure than today's 2-factor authentication (app or sms-based). In fact, 2-factor + Touch ID as it is today strengthens 2-factor authentication tremendously beyond…