jhzzamm
jhzzamm!
jhzzamm

Almost. A threat generally can’t be considered an assault, or actionable for enforcement. BUT (and these are big butts... :D )

-Public or prominent-enough people do get protection details when credibly threatened. Why shouldn’t everyone?

-And you make a great point that the psychological stress of being

Did Disney pay to be mentioned? Then it’s an ad. All else is bullshit.

Personally though, I have no problem if Google reminds me of cool things happening in town, as long as it rarely does so w/out being asked, lets me tell it to stop mid-sentence or turn them off entirely for good, and:

-Rotates thru local events first

“Interesting argument” !? It’s not even the same fucking conversation!!!.

If anyone attacked those women, they’d be arrested.

Someone attacked this guy. They were arrested.

HORRIBLY DISHONEST CONFLATION to promote your (valid) agenda. Be better.

Vwolf nailed it. A THREAT is very different than AN ACTUAL FUCKING ASSAULT. Which this was. Terrible talk.

So far, so stupid. Hopefully they’ll at least show us how many thumbs-up/down a movie gets, as a percentage, so we can know what the rest of the world thinks to gauge how good it might be. Fkn christ...

I did this in college. A one-time mistake.

Though to be fair, an abstinence sentence is weird, borderline cruel and unusual, as is having to pass a polygraph to prove it.

Better to just give him the jail time.

It is simple. Not enough of us are politically active, focused on national issues, and engaged to vote as one united base.

And BARELY ANY OF US CAME OUT TO VOTE THIS TIME.
(Trump won with less votes than Romney lost with).

We are a bunch of yoga moms, soccer dads, and take-shit-for-granted kids who grew up playing video

1.) This is the internet.
2.) So it’s not clear what anyone’s aware of or not.
3.) Tho I noted your sarcasm and said it was funny in my first words.
4.) And often sarcasm is a passive-agressive jab containing real sentiments.
5.) Which def echoed real sentiments that other people have out there.
6.) So many will likely

Funny snark, but tell that to the shas, sheiks, raw materials, tech and oil barons of the world. It might pleasantly surprise you to know that almost 1/4 of the world’s 50 richest people are not white. That proportion goes up dramatically w/in the top 500, and even better beyond that, until you hit the middle class.

You can bet he’ll be coming hard after states’ rights on Marijuana Legalization too.

Well, it *is paint (you can see the texture), but it’s a great makeup job of making it look like oil with specular highlights.

LOLOL This is the most brilliant comment in the history of the internet.

Helluva day! Heather would be Heather O’Reilly??

Aw. Heh, thanks, no that wasn’t true, was just writing a fish tale :P :)

Does “grabbing a virtual dinner” actually provide some character benefit?

Also: “Something nostalgic in the [crude low-poly simulation of trees and flowing water]...”

Is the manifestation of harm done to your brain by being raised on a steady diet of products, services, and virtual (sub)living.

You’ve been deprived of

Yup. Pelvic thrust to stand, sit butt back to bend.

While trying not to hinge the sitbone.

Oh, how far we have come:

Whaaat... that scene has been played out time and time again. Used plenty in Arkham 1, & no one needs to play “Batman Begins” (which was a game on orig. Xbox) to get a story we all know like the back of our hand.

The Tomatometer and the RT 1-10 scale are supposed to be very diff’t things. The Tomatometer/Audience combo tells you if it’s worth your time. How many ppl “basically are glad they saw it.”

The critics’ 1-10 scale lets critics do their job while still being fair to the production designers etc., who might have done