Like a write in candidate will ever win. It’s still defacto disenfranchisement even if it’s theoretically still possible for a candidate not on the ballot to win.

Anybody else seriously worried about state governments claiming they have the power to remove presidential candidates from their ballots, defacto allocating their electoral college votes without allowing people to actually vote? That sounds kind of terrifying/democracy destroying to me.

Right, but it’s a safe bet that everybody knew that the schlubs did this kind of thing, but they only get in trouble when a customer finds out.

Doesn’t matter. When the court orders a paternity test, you have to take it. You can’t just say “I’m sure X is/not the father, but I’m not going to prove it.” That’s not hour the courts work.

Because the court ordered it, because there was a real chance the result would prove something important. It ended up not proving what Erwin thought it would, but we can’t just say that you’re allowed to ignore court ordered paternity tests because you don’t feel like taking them.

I order from Amazon all the time, and while the packages are usually left outside my door while I’m at work, I’ve never had anybody not be able to find my condo, despite being pretty well hidden.

For one thing, not every pizza company is hiring drivers right now, and the ones that are don’t necessarily have hours that work for everybody.

Seems like it’s been sustainable for a pretty long time now. I’m guessing it’s a bad job that’s still as good or better than working fast food or in a clothing store somewhere, which is why so many people want it.

Because it’s cheaper for companies to have a few warehouses where everything gets flown too, and then distributed from, instead of every city having mail flown to every other city for the purpose of delivering a few letters. It sometimes creates weird situations like this, where it seems like it would have actually…

Prediction: Trump did some shitty things, and probably some things that are technically illegal like Stormy’s hush money, but nothing A) big enough to impeach him, or B) that involved direct collusion with the Russians beyond being helped by their attempts to ruin Clinton.

They’re no worse than other athletes: https://www.rt.com/usa/345383-half-college-athletes-admitted-rape/

They’re called “super-delegates” and they literally, not-secretly, have a major say in the election if it’s too close.

That’s what happens in primaries: You portray your opponent in a negative light. It’s not Bernie’s fault Hillary gave him so much ammunition to work with.

I stand corrected.

I don’t doubt his statements come from a place of experience, but wouldn’t an immigration lawyer have a very specific set of experiences with immigrants that might not be the norm? I’d expect an immigration lawyer to deal with only the richer immigrants who already have a job lined up, a social network in place, and…

Epic has some problems, but they’re all fixable, and anything that dethrone’s Steam’s near monopoly on AAA titles is going to be good in the long run. I’ve got a laundry list of issues with Steam, mostly related to all the shovelware they let in the store, but they’ll never change as long as they have no real…

So?

I’m actually pretty sure the price is set by the game’s producer, not Epic. You have to download Epic’s launcher to play games, so I guess you could count that as “how that product can be used” but it’s a bit of a stretch since everybody uses games the same way: they play them. What do you think Epic is going to do…

The benefit of Epic and similar stores is that Steam no longer has a near monopoly. Like Nathan pointed out, Steam charges a LOT to sell games on their store, a full 30% cut vs Epic’s 12%. That’s money that could have been better used to improve games.

Why do you thonk everyone disapproving of Epic is a Steam fan?