Those Google results are irrelevant. What is being criticized is the Daily Mail’s specific decision to use different terms, not the use of those terms in general.
Those Google results are irrelevant. What is being criticized is the Daily Mail’s specific decision to use different terms, not the use of those terms in general.
Good talk.
Cool. He will have a felony conviction for a harmless prank. Seems appropriate.
“there is a valid feeling about bisexual folks and trans people (and an enduring presence of maleness in all spheres of life) “taking away” spaces.”
Yeah. I don’t know much about LCD Soundsystem - I have one album and it is cool. But I have been a fan of bands that break up and get back together. That shit happens for a lot of different reasons. Maybe it’s a craven money grab, but whatever. If an artist I like to see perform says they will not perform again, I…
They’re not “giving consent.”
The reason for the form is that employers who don’t provide this coverage are subject to penalties. The form is a way of telling the government not to impose penalties, as due to their religious beliefs they are exempt from the requirement. Beyond that, the employer is not involved.
I’m not unsympathetic to the tale - the tale of the father who just can’t find a job, or isn’t qualified for a job, or has a job that barely pays and can’t make the unfair payments he’s required to make.
Don’t see anywhere where the OP says anyone “persevered.” Sounds like a really fucking hard life they all had to me. And I’m not sure I see the great payoff....except taking responsibility for the survival of their children.
He doesn’t have a career. He’s a 50 year old writer who used to make six figures and now is a freelancer who’s lucky to get $10,000. That career trajectory means he’s failed. His kids, and more specifically his kids’ mothers, are paying for that failure. He needs to open his eyes, recognize where he’s at in his life…
It is relatively rare for someone to receive consecutive sentences, for different counts, unless mandated by law. And sentences are more determined by the sentencing guideline calculations than the maximum allowable sentence.
Damn. Good callback.
The fucking irony is going to cause my head to explode. Is this guy the stupidest fucking guy on the planet? Or just the absolutely least self-aware? Both, I guess. This moron makes Justin Bieber look like Stephen Fucking Hawking.
So this headline is definitely trolling and I approve.
You’re drunk.
Sorry....the constitution is relevant here, how?
Of course he’s alleging he was unfairly expelled. But there is nothing in that statement that is particularly convincing on that point.
If what is true, Yale fucked up? There is nothing in that statement that indicates Yale fucked anything up.
Except that does happen. You’re familiar with the circumstances of every acquaintance rape such that you can definitively say that never happens?
I don’t know. The statement in the article is hardly a full exposition of the facts. For example, there is nothing in there about what the circumstances of them going their “separate ways” after the allegedly non-consensual sex.