Haha. That’s why you get so much shit. You are a condescending idiot. I can deal with someone who is condescending and actually smart. I can deal with someone who is dumb, but not condescending. But a fucking moron who is condescending, but at the same time lacks basic reading comprehension and rational thinking…

They have research that homosexuality is due to factors beyond the control of the individual - not choice. You din’t get to give the agenda of this discussion, you condescending, idiotic, homophobic fuck. I posted research that postulates that homosexuality is caused by a variety of genetic and environmental factors…

You’re a lying homophobe. You told me to find peer-reviewed research that homosexuality is not a choice. You refuse to post one bit of evidence to support your assertion that homosexuality is a choice, and you explicitly misrepresent what I posted. Homosexuality is not a choice. Not morally, not logically, and not…

I think it’s odd you are posting this comment on an article that calls a movie racist specifically because of its portrayal of Native Americans. Also, I can’t turn any which way without hearing about how offensive a certain near-D.C. based professional football team’s nickname is.

I’m pretty sure you can flop a Netflix movie, just like you could flop an HBO production. You and I might not know right off the bat whether or not it’s a flop - Netflix isn’t going to come out and say “This movie that will be on our platform forever is a flop, guys!” But I’m sure they have their own internal metrics…

Awwww....did I hurt your homophobic bigoted feelings? Well, you have unlimited free will, asshole. Just don’t be offended! Better yet, stop being a moronic homophobe.

Aaaah.....you’re one of those assholes who thinks if a woman does not immediately report her sexual assault to the authorities that have a history of mishandling sexual assault cases and sexual assault victims, especially victims who are sex workers. You aren’t concerned about evidence - you are concerned about what…

Fuck you troll. Enjoy your pathetic, ignorant life. Or post some scientific research that supports your position. Ignorant, homophobic fuck.

Wait, wait. Let me get this straight. Your example of a guy whose life and career was ruined is Anthony Anderson? The guy who has appeared in at least 15 movies since the charges against him were dropped? The guy who currently has the lead role in a popular network sitcom? The guy whose Wikipedia page doesn’t even ment…

Who is Anthony Anderson?

Got it. So, if there were a video or audio of the rape occurring, or forensic evidence from a rape kit, you wouldn’t consider that evidence either because it would not yet have been authenticated and no foundation would have been laid for its introduction yet in a court proceeding. You didn’t mean “something that…

Okay, idiot. You are arguing just to argue. It is not hyperbolic to discount one single example from nearly 100 years ago that, given the myriad recent cases proving my point, is simply not relevant. And I am not writing off old art (nice capitalization of the silent film age professor), I am pointing out how long ago…

Fuck off you pedantic little shit. My argument isn’t undermined because of one famous man from a century ago, a silent fucking film star that most living Americans don’t even know. “Yeah, he’s right about Jameis Winston, Mike Tyson, Ben Roethlisberger, Patrick Kane, Woody Allen, Tupac Shakur, Bill Clinton, etc...but…

How does that make your testimony not evidence? If I can go into court and lie in my testimony, and a valid verdict could be based on that lie, that sure sounds like evidence to me. Knowing you are allowed to lie may make it less credible evidence, but it is evidence nonetheless.

Okay. I will go back to edit my post to say that since Fatty Arbucle’s, a fucking silent film star, was blacklisted nearly 100 fucking years ago following multiple rape trials, it doesn’t happen that famous men have their lives ruined over a single rape accusation.

I am more than semantically right, the definition of testimony is a form of evidence. And I never “implied” it made anything definite, I was responding to a comment that said there was “no evidence” which isn’t true. Curious what legal system you’re from that testimony is not considered evidence.

Google it. Testimony is a type of evidence. It diesn’t HAVE to be corroborated by anything. It may not be believed. But it is evidence. Look it up.

You should have just typed “I am a moron who can’t read.” I never said it was evidence enough for a conviction. I never said it was conclusivesaid it was evidence. In your idiotic example your testimony that I hit your dog is evidence (if purported to be based on your direct observation). I have countervailing…

No, idiot, you are wrong. Spare me your dumb lectures about how the law works, since you are obviously ignorant.

I provided more than the APA link. I provided a link that cites actual research that is not the APA link. And on whether homosexuality is a choice, it absolutely does address choice, and it does not use carefully worded language. Homosexuality is not a choice, and it is harmful to treat it as if it is: