which Tesla contests, saying she was “given special treatment and opportunities for advancement that were unwarranted based on her qualifications.”

That’s a little more complicated. He doesn’t endorse anything the Fuhrer says, and he certainly did nothing to help get Trump elected.... mainly he keeps trying to give him good advice and being ignored. Also he did say he’ll probably cut things off if Trump leaves the Paris Accords (which he did!)

So they hired an independent investigator and they didn’t find anything to back up her claims. Seems like an open-and-shut case. I’d fire her too

Kinja readers: “They might build a new pipeline, lets protest it out of existance”

I know that this is a contentious viewpoint but if here in Canada we believe in rehabilitation, shouldn’t we accept that she has paid her debt to society and yes, maybe keep an eye out, but also move on? I’m not trying to excuse her past behaviours or brush off the horrific things that happened, but just because…

lol, no offense to Jezebel writers, but I think you’re overhyping their celebrity status.

It appears as if the real issue they’re having is with the fact that the installation was created by a White person.

There’s certainly nothing wrong with disagreeing with a piece of art, and I definitely see their point. But removing art because some people disagree with it is... worrisome to me.

Co-opting? Marginalizing? Hate crime?

I don’t know how its not the whites’ “story”. They were the perpetrators. It seems a pretty powerful piece of art in support of the indigenous. I am failing to see why this engendered a protest...

As a gay man, who looks at all heterosexuals, male and female, as pretty fucking stupid in their inability to get their individual and collective shit together, I can only say...

Is it working both ways?
The two majority genders seem to be heading toward irreconcilable differences.
Fewer people getting married or even getting in relationships.

Men can’t handle women and women are sick of men? Something something thinkpiece.

I clicked on the headline really eager to hear what specifically lead her to characterize the representation of women in these films as “disturbing,” and I was really disappointed to see that everything she said was really brief and vague. I’m sure we can all imagine what she meant in general, but still, it sounds…

Who benefits from this post?

Seriously? A bunch of people are dead and you go with a glib remark? This isn’t helping.

Why would I be sad? The dude is getting in, and its not guys that are flipping shit over it. Look at this article. Look at the responses to the guy on twitter.

Uhhhhhhh... where the same people who laughed at civil rights violations are are now losing their shit because they will have to share a theater with a penis?

right?! It’s not that it “works,” you were just lucky. I can promise you that I am most likely super fucking fertile thanks to my mom’s genetics and I would get pregnant in a second using the pull-out method

god fucking damn it, the pull-out method. As a public health worker, I just have to cringe.

You should change the headline - even if just for this woman's sake - yes, she had an abortion but she did so for a very specific reason and it's click bait to leave the headline as is. I was horrified by the title and then immediately realized it was misleading.