You're a clown on every level literally every thing you said is completely false.

Right...

haha i do want one...

I know its conservative...lets see where we're getting...

Yep. Or you could logically think that the car has the same performance as a decade old car and the price has doubled in a decade.

Thats good, it's on par with the e46 CSL...

You don't need the power to get the performance. It's a lighter car.

What are you talking about? Everyone knows the vanos can crap out... did you know the hood bulge on the e46 (the first Time it appeared) to fit the vanos on the 3.2l engine? or the 18hp difference between the m roadtser and m3 was due to shorter more restricted exhaust on the m roadster..see I can be a douche a point…

AGREE 10000%

OK i was being sarcastic. Im assuming your young...BMW has always understated its #'s back then the M3 was testing in 4.2 -4.3 range and the CSL was under 4.

my point was less about dinan and more about aftermarket anything on the E46 is better than the new M3 which for all intensive purporses seems pretty Ho-hum especially since the 3.0 Turbo engine been tuned for almost 8 years now.

Thank you.. and you'd think someone with name Mike135 would get it...

So if I follow you correctly...you're saying BMW is lying about it's numbers now...but it wasn't back then. So in 2004 when they said 4.5 0-60 it was true...but now 4.5 really means 4.0

touche...agreed #vanosproblems

agree with that sentiment if you want new car features...warranty and looks.

Nope don't know anything about BMW or Dinan or cars...and apparently you cant read and extrapalate and 1 concept to another...

The E46 doesn't need that much more power to keep up with the new car...

yes mike135is...I'm "hating" for pointing out that the cars performance #'s are the same as they were a decade ago...You're the reason why BMW drivers have a bad name.

i want

bronx is different than manhattan...