Maybe it had something to do with him forking over $400 million dollars of his own money to upgrade the Dolphins stadium... Just a guess.

My guess is it’s a tourism dollars thing: they won’t have a lock on being the most vacation-y NFL city anymore

The only losers here are the taxpayers of Las Vegas.

good. Oakland shouldn’t be subsidizing the stadium.

They’re traveling for free on a employee pass... There’s different standards when you get it free from the an employee (which then you do represent the company even if you don’t know it) rather than when you paid for your seat.

Whoa whoa whoa. Your rationale, calm response has no place in today’s news cycle. Get outraged!

Lots of tweets, but pictures would say much more. If their leggings were shear enough to effectively be pantyhose/underwear as opposed to proper clothing, I would side with United. It’s unreasonable to assume that just because one of the passengers was young that her parents had her dressed properly. We really…

If that’s the case I’d be interested in going and talking to the crews from a technical standpoint and hearing about some of the engineering that goes into the trucks. Too often we, the fans, are pushed away from that sort of knowledge without insider access. 

Oh, yeah, that’s out of my hands. But you need video to get imagery in these cases, and this was the local news video.

“Driverless” was never used.

This is the exact reason I wrote that line. Check the Google news headlines on it—“involved in.” That is why this headline is very specific.

Maybe I’m getting jaded, but as far as neogawker in general goes this headline’s actually pretty straightforward.

Former driving instructor hears track has money coming in, launches frivolous suit.

Because people see headlines that say “Driverless Uber car involved in crash” and fail to read the rest of the story. They conclude autonomous vehicles are unsafe.

Why would this look bad for Uber if the other guy failed to yield & it’s his fault?

True, the Nautical Acronym Veracity Yokels are a sensitive bunch.

The whole US government is just awful about acronyms.

yeah this is clearly a case of “we have this awesome name now we have to explain it” kind of like S.H.I.E.L.D.

I don’t think the Navy would like you suggesting they’re a pawn of the Acronym Research and Marketing Yuppies...

im more and more convinced that the entire armed service is just a front for an acronym service.