It concerned me too. There's no way that was a touchdown.

Did that.... did that just knock her head off?

The difference in your examples and homosexuality is that every person gets goosebumps when they're cold or wrinkly finger tips when they're wet. Why does it matter whether or not it's a choice or whether you're born that way? If it's a choice (and we have no scientific evidence to prove otherwise), then so what? …

Dude was just checking his cell phone.

Why would I enroll in formal classes? I thought you suggested classes on sarcasm and word play.

I just disagree with your original statement, which you've shifted away from completely. Now you're actually giving the definition of "majority". Your original narrative was that the definition of majority is when the majority of a population has no issue with things that bother minorities. That's nonsensical.

Was your second thought: "Who is James Ennis?"

Sad but true, I've never used or heard the term specious. But I'm always looking to expand my vocabulary, so I'm glad you used it. I'm not sure we can have a productive conversation about this on a comment section, but I'll stay hopeful. Before we can even progress into a conversation, the definition of "marriage"…

I'm gonna go with yes, I'm that dense. Gay marriage is an extremely complicated issue that mixes dynamics of religion and the state. It's not quite as black and white as the intellectual superiors on Kinja would like to think.

What do you mean by specious reason? I've never heard that term.

Then Arkansas needs to change that. That's unrelated to the issue of Torii Hunter, however. Or maybe it's not. He specifically stated that marriage should be between man and woman, without mentioning civil unions. Maybe that is interpreted by the public as meaning that civil unions should only be between man and…

I do. Thank you, FuriousFrank. Take luck and care for it.

Oh, it's very easy to understand, and I'm well aware of what the 14th amendment says. What I'm saying is that the term "marriage" is religious in nature and in definition. That should not change. The rights that come along with marriage are listed in your examples. Those should be extended (and I hope they are,…

Hahaha, exactly. I'm guessing you're also married. "Equal protection under the law" seems specific enough, but it's not as it concerns to marriage. Gay couples do have legal protection under the law. Civil unions are legally binding and non-religous. Perhaps the solution to the issue should be that legally, all…

Yeah, that's not a Civil Right. Civil unions are legal as a non-religious parallel to marriage.

Which Civil Rights is he working to deny?

For real. I've even been keeping up with it via Deadspin and the interview still made it seem so strange. There really needs to be an epic rap battle between Feminists and Gamers.

"Otis, go out there and play like there are two grams of coke hidden in each base"

And what about Otis Nixon? I say safe.