He just doesn’t want to pay for it, obviously them Muslims are gonna come after HIS money, he’s rich and they’re all leftist pinko queers them Muslims is!

Ahhh good ol’ Deathclaws

Everyone knows you just land on the sun at night so it’s not hot...

And now we know what this couple would do for a Klondike Bar.

Let’s see founded by Christians, for Christians, in Christ... hrrrm... let me look here, I’m almost sure somewhere on one of these pieces of velum it says... oh here it is.

I think that goes beyond reasonable when it comes to reasonable accommodations. When making an exception for you requires an act of government beyond the passing of the Religious Protection law itself, you’ve gone beyond reasonable IMO.

Well given that in her county all paperwork processed is done so under her authority. Her office (as in the office of Clerk) is the issuing authority. If they remove the issuing authority from Marriage Licenses (which she has done) puts them into a legally precarious position. While the governor has promised the state…

I can’t help but give you a star and I’d give many many more for the apparently unintentional pun that made me snort soda.

Which is the reason there is trouble with her not doing her oathbound duty. She was even provided the allowance to not personally issue licenses.

By what I’ve read there, Kim Davis has already been given Reasonable Accommodation. Her further changing the process goes beyond such an Accommodation by making the forms legally questionable.

Then let me ask it this way. Does the religious freedom being used here cover that as an Asatru I feel I should blot at noon on the solstices. My work does not allow for the consumption of alcohol during business hours. Should I then be allow the one alcoholic beverage that would be consumed at the blot even if I work…

She has joined a church. I am using that church’s interpretation as laid down by their own clergy. If that doesn’t define her faith, then I suppose that joining the Catholic Church and then demanding a religious exemption as a lunch lady to not serve meat on Friday (a church based decision) and on Sunday (a personal…

But it is relevant to this conversation. She is enforcing a single part of her deeply held beliefs, and as such she is invalidating her own stand for religious protection. She is requesting that we give her allowance for her religious beliefs, fine I’m accepting that for the conversation. However she is using one…

Love to see you saying what people are thinking Cassie as always.

If we are going to get into what her faith allows or doesn’t allow and if she’s following all the tenants of her own faith while denying other people rights granted at the federal level lets look at;

Actually it’s only her husband who sinned in the case of remarriage since he remarried HER after divorcing her. It’s the Adultery she engaged in that is the equivalent ‘sin’ to the people she is refusing to serve. (Just a little pedantic note mostly because I think everyone should be lambasted for what they’ve done…

I could agree with you, I’ve had this argument several times with people, the problem is that taking someone’s rights and acknowledging someones rights are false equivalents.

This is my ‘I’m listening to you whine about your RIGHTS’ face.

Well there is that coleslaw machine....

But don’t bother with reading and writing... we can’t do that either.